Sunday, May 19, 2013

National Mineral Development Corporation ignores steel ministry objections to export iron ore

Times of India: Raipur: Sunday, May 19, 2013.
National Mineral Development Corporation (NMDC) has entered into an agreement with Japanese and Korean companies for supply of iron ore from Bailadila mines in Chhattisgarh 'overlooking' objections raised by ministry of steel.
The export of quality iron ore was being proposed when domestic industries are facing crisis of iron ore and are shutting down.
The fact came to light following an RTI query by activist Kusum Chandrashekhar Gaur to ministry of steel. The ministry informed that NMDC and ministry of commerce were apprised with the opinion of ministry of steel over the export to Japan and Korea, but ministry of steel refused to provide details of the opinion stating, 'the same could affect the commercial interests of NMDC'.
Replying to a similar query under RTI Act, NMDC has informed that the Bailadila mines are having an estimated reserve of just around 30 years.
"Given the quantity of reserves available there seems to be no rationale behind the exports that too at the cost of domestic units, which are shutting down," Gaur, an activist based at Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh said.
According to Chhattisgarh Sponge Iron Manufactures Association president Anil Nachrani, pricing policy and non-tactical cost of iron ore supplied by public sector giant NMDC is responsible for the situation. NMDC is exporting iron ore to Japan at a much lower rate than its domestic sale price.
After two years of break in 2009-10 and 10-11, NMDC has again resorted to export of iron ore to Japan, despite getting a lower realization in exports than the domestic market thereby subsidizing Japan's steel industry, he said.
"It is surprising that NMDC is exporting iron ore to Japan at a lower price at a time when the domestic steel industry is struggling. We smell a rat in the NMDC-Japan pricing deal", Nachrani alleged.
He claimed that the public sector giant was supplying iron ore to Japan at a much lesser price than the prices in the domestic market presumably under pressure from the Union ministry of commerce to maintain good bi-lateral relations with that country.