DNA: Mumbai: Wednesday,
March 20, 2013.
A reply to an
Right to Information (RTI) query filed by a Bandra resident revealed that
records of hundreds of acres of land are missing from the revenue office in
Panvel. The state information commission has now directed the public
information officer to provide the information by March 28.
The RTI
applicant John Miranda owns land in Panvel. He had filed an RTI application
with the talathi office of Vavanje village, Panvel taluka, to get the details
of the mutation entries of his land last year. The talathi, who is also the
public information officer, did not give Miranda the information he needed
within the stipulated time. His first appeal with the tehsildar of the Panvel
tehsil office, who is the first appellate authority, did not pass any order on
the appeal.
Subsequently,
he filed the second appeal with the state information commission. The
commission members asserted that the revenue officials are using delaying
tactics.
Finally on
March 6, the public information officer’s responded. The officer stated that
the register of the mutation entries from 1 to 459 of the Vavanje village are
not available with the revenue office. “The register could not be traced as no
communication is available with our office. In fact, information about who was
the then talathi in the taluka is also not available with the office,” the
response stated. It added that it is unknown when the register went missing
which is why the information about who was the then tehsildar is also not
traceable.
“The public
information officer’s reply is not acceptable and clearly shows that they are
deliberately delaying in providing the information. In this matter, it is
necessary to file a criminal complaint under Maharashtra Public Records Act
2005,” the state information commission’s order stated. It added that the
public information officer has to search the records and give the information
by March 28.
Khar-based
activist Daphne Warapen, who is working with Miranda to get the information,
said, “How can the office not have the register or know who was the then
talathi or tehsildar? This shows that there is a nexus between revenue
officials and developers, who are trying to usurp prime property.”