Economic Times: New Delhi:
Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
In a peculiar
case, the Central Information Commission could not punish some CBIofficials for
a delayed response on an RTI application seeking information on Commonwealth
Games related corruption cases as the persons concerned were "no longer in
service".
During a
hearing of a complaint filed by Delhi advocateVivek Garg, Chief Information
CommissionerSatyananda Mishra said no penalty was imposed on the officials with
CBI's Anti Corruption Branch (ACB), who were responsible for the delay in
dealing with the RTI plea, as they were no longer in service.
The CBI had
submitted that the delay was caused as the ACB received the the RTI application
and a complaint on the matter at around same time. In their attempt to deal
with both the complaint and the RTI application together the delay was caused,
it said.
"This is
hardly a very convincing application. There was no need to club the complaint
and the RTI application even if the subject matter of the both was similar. The
RTI application needed to be disposed of within a fixed time period," the
panel said in the order.
Garg had
sought to know details of action taken report on his complaints filed against
Delhi Chief MinisterSheila Dikshit and other functionaries alleging their
involvement in corruption in executing CWG related projects in the national
capital.
The respondent
from the CBI also submitted the then Central Public Information Officer (CPIO)
in charge of the ACB had died in the meanwhile, while the other officials
dealing with the subject had either retired or left the job on resignations.
"Thus,
all concerned who were responsible for the delay in the ACB are no longer there
in service. In these circumstances, we have no option but to close the case
without imposing any penalty on anyone," Chief Information Commissioner
Satyananda Mishra said in the order issued on March 7.
But, there is
one lesson for the present CPIO, he must not mix up the RTI application with
anything else even if the subject matter is the same and act on the RTI
application strictly according to the provisions of the transparency law, Mishra
said in the order.
Garg had
filed the RTI application on December 11, 2011. Aggrieved over the delayed
response, he had approached the CIC last year.