Friday, February 05, 2016

Rights panel relief for 'failed' girl, action against exam board

Calcutta Telegraph: Patna: Friday, 05 February 2016.
A 17-year-old girl student of Rohtas was declared "fail" in the final result of the Class X exam conducted by the board in September 2014. Her repeated requests to the board for re-evaluation went unheeded, forcing her to seek the intervention of the Bihar State Human Rights Commission (BSHRC) for justice.
Re-evaluation of the answer sheets of the girl, Priyanka Kumari, a student of Chaukhandi High School, Sasaram in Rohtas district, around 160km south of Patna, ended up with she being declared "pass" (successful) in first division, scoring 329 of 500 marks, which comes to about 65.8 per cent.
Interestingly, the re-evaluation was done by a team of experts appointed by the board on the BSHRC's directive for the third time. Priyanka, a resident of Alampur village near Sasaram in Rohtas district, was not satisfied with two earlier re-evaluations, which took the tally to 244 and 305, respectively.
The ordeal of Priyanka started in September 2014 when she was declared "fail" in the exam. She approached the board at least 10 times, requesting the senior officials to conduct re-evaluation of the answer sheets but in vain. Even applications submitted under the Right to Information Act (RTI) served no purpose.
She was so depressed with the callous attitude of the board that she had stopped taking mealS. "She survived on milk for about three months till the matter was taken up by the BSHRC," recalled Priyanka's uncle Dharmendra Kumar.
Finding no help from anywhere, Priyanka knocked the door of the BSHRC after three months. Taking a serious note of the matter, the commission ordered a probe. The board later appointed experts, which after re-evaluation declared her successful and awarded her 244 marks. Unsatisfied, she asked for revision and her marks increased after every re-evaluation.
Priyanka kept on shuttling between Sasaram and Patna for about 15 months till the case was disposed of on January 21.
She, however, got the copy of the order of the commission on January 27, which directed the state government to provide her Rs 75,000, as compensation and Rs 25,000 as scholarship, two-and-a-half times more than a girl student is given by the education department after passing matriculation (Class X) examination.
In addition, an assistant in the board, Ranjan Kumar, was put under suspension and nine teachers involved in initial re-evaluation answer sheets were blacklisted and debarred from evaluation work. "We are yet to receive the copy of the commission's directive. It will be complied with," a deputy secretary-rank officer of the board said.
Priyanka got the copy of the commission's order passed by justice (retd) Mandata Singh on January 27. "I have all respect for the judiciary (BSHRC), which finally delivered justice and saved my career," she said, adding that the decision would help her fulfil her dream of becoming an IAS officer.
She added that she smelt a foul play soon after going through the marksheets. "I was awarded only five marks (of 100) in mathematics, which raised my doubts over the evaluation system. Then I decided to fight for justice," Priyanka, the second among the three children of Vinod Singh, a resident of Alampur village in Rohtas district, told The Telegraph.
Priyanka's elder brother Sujeet, however, scored 75 per cent marks in the same exam. Her younger brother Pradumna is a Class IX student. Her father, a farmer by profession, is all praise for the commission for delivering justice to a bright student, who wants to become an IAS officer.