The
Hindu: New Delhi: Sunday, 17 August 2014.
Are defence
organisations exempted under RTI?
The Supreme
Court has decided to examine whether defence organisations such as the Defence
Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) can withhold information regarding
transfer of an employee, claiming that they are exempted organisations under
the Right to Information Act.
A Bench of
Justices Dipak Misra and V. Gopala Gowda issued a notice to the Centre and the
DRDO on a petition filed by Dr. Neelam Bhalla, a scientist, who was transferred
to a different unit and has sought the reasons for her transfer under the RTI
Act. Having failed to get relief before the Central Information Commission and
the Delhi High Court, she has moved the apex court.
The
petitioner contended that only those information which directly affected and
correlated to “intelligence and security” could be exempted and would not apply
to information which were general in nature.
She said this
petition raised an important question of law as to the interpretation of
section 24 of the Right to Information Act, vis–a-vis the exclusion of exempted
organisations such as the DRDO. She said citizens were deprived of records
relating to their services not being related to corruption and human rights
violation.
She said the
“wilful disclosure of incorrect or false or misleading information relating to
routine matters such as transfer not only to the petitioner but also to higher
authorities, namely the Minister of Defence and the National Commission for
Women, to justify their actions, was an offence under the newly enacted Whistle
Blowers Protection Act.”
She said she
was a victim of gender discrimination and humiliation at the hands of senior
scientists and in this context, filed a complaint before the NCW inter-alia
alleging nepotism and lapses in the policy of recruitment and in particular
that her task for the recruitment of scientists ‘B’ was selectively taken away.
She prayed for a direction to the authorities to disclose the reasons for her
transfer.