Thursday, July 24, 2014

Row over Kerala State Films Awards: Did jury chairman watch all 85 films?

The Times of India: Kerala: Thursday, 24 July 2014.
There seems to be no end to the controversies surrounding the Kerala State Film Awards, as new issues keep popping up almost every year.
This year is no exception. After the row over the State Film Awards jury picking the wrong singer of an award winning song, now the Kerala High Court has issued notices to the Kerala State Chalachitra Academy, the state government and P Bharatiraja, chairman of the jury of Kerala state film awards 2013, alleging irregularities in the selection of films considered for the State Award. This is following a petition filed by Anilkumar Ambalakkara, who is the producer of National Award winning movie, Perariyathavar. Earlier, he had filed a Right to Information (RTI) application seeking the details regarding jury chairman's visit and stay in the city.
It was at the press conference organised to announce this year's State Film Awards that the jury chairman said that he had seen all the movies submitted for the competition. However, the complainant now alleges that the chairman did not see all the 85 films considered for the awards and the norms for the selection of films for the awards were violated.
As per the documents retrieved under RTI, the screening of the movies was held from March 17 to April 4. Apparently, Bharathiraja first arrived in the city to review the films on March 19 evening and left the city on March 21 afternoon. Later, the filmmaker arrived again on March 30 and left on April 4. "From this schedule itself, it is very clear that he was here for only seven days and the time is not at all enough to watch all the 85 movies. In fact, we came to know that he didn't watch the movie Perariyathavar, as he had left the place by then. He did not watch many other movies as well," says the petitioner, adding that he has sought a derivative to comprise an expert screening committee to evaluate all the films submitted for competition for 2013.
Director Harikumar, who was part of the jury, strongly defended the complainant's statement saying that the chairman had watched all the movies. "The technology is advanced, and there are many ways to watch a film. In fact, it is not necessary to watch it in theatres. But as a jury member, I can assure you, we judged each and every film based on technical excellence and the performance of the artistes. And the judgment was quite impartial," he added.
However, Dr Biju pointed out that Harikumar's statement is quite contradictory. "Most of the films, including Perariyathavar, haven't released yet and its DVDs are not available. So, how is it possible to watch such a film elsewhere?" he asks.