Times of India: Chennai: Monday,
January 27, 2014.
Life convict
Susairaj still cannot believe that his impulsive decision to return to jail
one-day late after a three-day emergency parole in 2006 has resulted in six
years of additional imprisonment. He is all set to be released from jail now,
thanks to an order of the Madras high court, which said the alleged prison
offence should not be held against him.
Susairaj, 43,
married with two daughters, was arrested by the Kasimedu police in 1997 in
connection with a murder case. He was found guilty and sentenced to undergo
imprisonment for life. The sentence was confirmed by the high court too.
On November
10, 2006, he managed to obtain three-day emergency parole to visit his ailing
mother and children. Though he should have returned to the prison by November
14, he stayed back for a day as the children had high fever. He, however,
returned to jail in the early morning of November 15, 2006, said his counsel P
Pugalenthi.
While so, the
then DMK government came out with an amnesty scheme for life convicts and
decided to prematurely release those who had completed seven years of actual
imprisonment, as on September 15, 2008. A total of 1,405 life convicts were
released.
But Susairaj
was not included in the list of beneficiaries, apparently due to the fact that
he returned later after parole. As Susairaj had completed eight years of
imprisonment, he was fully eligible for premature release, but for the alleged
prison offence, submitted advocate M Radhakrishnan.
After
information obtained through the Right To Information (RTI) Act revealed that
there were no prison records about the alleged overstay by Susairaj during his
parole, his wife Meena moved the high court for his release.
A division
bench of Justice S Rajeswaran and Justice P N Prakash, allowing her plea on
Wednesday, said: "The detenue has overstayed for a day, which certainly
cannot be put against him for considering his premature release." They
also directed the prison authorities to release Susairaj immediately unless he
is not required in connection with any other case.