Hindustan Times: New
Delhi: Wednesday, June 19, 2013.
A crucial
piece of correspondence has gone missing from the law ministry barely two
months after the Central Information Commission (CIC) directed that it be made
public.
An RTI
activist had sought to know why the petroleum ministry wanted a senior
government law officer replaced in a high profile corporate battle being fought
in the Delhi High Court in 2011.
The CIC, in
its April 29 order, had, in turn, directed the law ministry to disclose the
communication and file notings related to the removal of additional solicitor
general Amarjit Singh Chandiok as the government’s law officer in a dispute
with Essar Steel.
In its reply
to RTI activist Subhash Chandra Aggarwal, the government’s legal arm stated the
“letter is not traceable/available” in the department of legal affairs.
The CIC order
came on Aggarwal’s appeal after the law ministry declined to provide him a copy
of the letter written by the petroleum ministry, asking for Chandiok’s removal
from the case.
The CIC
rejected the contention of the petroleum ministry that the letter from its
secretary to the law secretary was “confidential” and related to a “sensitive
issue”, so should not be disclosed.
Essar Steel
had challenged the petroleum ministry’s move to reduce the supply of natural
gas from the KG-D6 fields off the Andhra
Pradesh coast, citing a fall in output.
The petroleum
ministry was unhappy with Chandiok for “misrepresenting” its stand in the
court. “The stand taken by the ASG (Chandiok) before the court was against the
instructions of the ministry and also contradicted the ministry’s affidavit,”
it stated on July 4, 2011.
“The ASG, in
his statement before the court, conceded to the main demand of the private
company and did not argue on merit…. He informed us about the court proceedings
after a month,” the ministry had complained to the government’s legal arm.
