Monday, May 20, 2013

Ajay Maken, Rajiv Shukla differ over bringing BCCI under RTI Act

BNLive: New Delhi: Monday, May 20, 2013.
Even as Law Minister Kapil Sibal proposed a new law to fight fixing in sports, his Cabinet colleagues Rajiv Shukla and Ajay Maken spoke in two different voices over the exemption of BCCI from the Right to Information Act. Union Minister Ajay Maken, who earlier held the sports portfolio, wants the BCCI brought under the Right to Information Act.
He tweeted, "BCCI should agree to come under RTI. Any organisation entrusted with job of selecting a National Team can not call itself a Private Body!"
But Maken's call was rejected by his Cabinet colleague and IPL chief Rajiv Shukla. "A private body cannot be brought under RTI. Bringing BCCI under RTI will not check spot-fixing," Shukla said.
Maken, who holds Housing portfolio at present, said the Centre has already taken a stand before Central Information Commission (CIC) that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) should be under the ambit of the Information law. During his stint in the Sports Ministry, Maken had tried to bring transparency in sports bodies through the Sports Bill.
But following divergent views within the Union Cabinet, he was asked to redraft certain provisions. In December, 2011 the Sports Ministry had informed the CIC that there are "just and reasonable grounds" for bringing BCCI under the ambit of the Right to Information Act.
In a seven-page written statement submitted before the CIC, the Sports Ministry had said although there is no direct funding of the BCCI, it gets "substantial indirect funding" from the government in the form of revenue forgo like "concessions in income tax, customs duty, etc" and land at concessional rates for stadiums.
The Ministry also said BCCI is performing the functions "akin" to State and 'public duties' by selecting national teams and representing India in international events. According to section 2(h) of RTI Act, even a non-government organisation comes under the ambit of the transparency law if it is substantially financed, "directly or indirectly" by funds provided by the appropriate government.