Bar and Bench: New Delhi: Thursday, 2nd July
2026.
A Division Bench upheld a 2010 judgement of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and rejected NSE's appeal.
The Delhi High Court on
Wednesday ruled that the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India is a public
authority under the Right to Information Act (RTI Act).
Being classified as a public authority makes the institution subject to the RTI Act.
A Division Bench of Justices C Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla upheld a 2010 judgement of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and rejected NSE's appeal against the judgement.
"We entirely agree, and wholeheartedly endorse the finding, of the learned Single Judge, that the NSEI is an “authority” within the meaning of the first part of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act," the Bench said.
He said that the recognition granted by the Central Government, later delegated to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), effectively constituted the NSE as an institution of self-government under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act.
The single-judge also held that NSE is a body controlled by the Central government.
The NSE challenged the judgement before a Division Bench. It argued that it was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, making it a private corporate entity rather than a government body.
The Division Bench stayed the single judge (Justice Khanna's) judgement on May 4, 2010.
In its final verdict today, it upheld the single-judge decision.
It concluded that the "justification provided by the learned Single Judge, in the impugned judgment, for each of these findings, is eloquent and reasoned, and we see no cause to disturb the findings".
Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta with advocates Pranav Sarthi, Prachi Dhingra, Ishan Agrawal, Gandharv Garg, Jasleen Oberoi, Anshit Aggarwal, Mansvini Jain and Udit Bajpai appeared for the NSE.
The RTI applicant was represented through advocates Ashish Aggarwal, OP Faizi, Anand Aggarwal, Darshana Aggarwal, Nishtha Verma, Lisha Arora, Tanya Jain, Himanshu Singh, Ishita and Anjali.
CGSC BS Shukla and Dashmesh Tripathi represented the Union of India.
[Read Judgement]
A Division Bench upheld a 2010 judgement of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and rejected NSE's appeal.
Being classified as a public authority makes the institution subject to the RTI Act.
A Division Bench of Justices C Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla upheld a 2010 judgement of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and rejected NSE's appeal against the judgement.
"We entirely agree, and wholeheartedly endorse the finding, of the learned Single Judge, that the NSEI is an “authority” within the meaning of the first part of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act," the Bench said.
He said that the recognition granted by the Central Government, later delegated to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), effectively constituted the NSE as an institution of self-government under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act.
The single-judge also held that NSE is a body controlled by the Central government.
The NSE challenged the judgement before a Division Bench. It argued that it was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, making it a private corporate entity rather than a government body.
The Division Bench stayed the single judge (Justice Khanna's) judgement on May 4, 2010.
In its final verdict today, it upheld the single-judge decision.
It concluded that the "justification provided by the learned Single Judge, in the impugned judgment, for each of these findings, is eloquent and reasoned, and we see no cause to disturb the findings".
Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta with advocates Pranav Sarthi, Prachi Dhingra, Ishan Agrawal, Gandharv Garg, Jasleen Oberoi, Anshit Aggarwal, Mansvini Jain and Udit Bajpai appeared for the NSE.
The RTI applicant was represented through advocates Ashish Aggarwal, OP Faizi, Anand Aggarwal, Darshana Aggarwal, Nishtha Verma, Lisha Arora, Tanya Jain, Himanshu Singh, Ishita and Anjali.
CGSC BS Shukla and Dashmesh Tripathi represented the Union of India.
[Read Judgement]
.JPG)
.JPG)
