Ahmedabad Mirror: Ahmedabad: Tuesday, 20 January 2026.
Says using the transparency law in this manner fails to advance its core objectives
The Central Information
Commission (CIC) has ruled that advocates cannot use the Right to Information
(RTI) Act to seek details regarding cases they are handling for clients,
observing that using the transparency law in this manner fails to advance its core
objectives.
Dismissing a second appeal filed by an advocate on the termination of a fruits/vegetables supply contract in Haryana, Information Commissioner Sudha Rani Relangi noted that the appellant had sought information “on behalf of his brother, who used to be supplier of vegetables/fruits to the respondent public authority”. The commission said in the absence of any explanation as to why the supplier himself could not seek the information, “it appears that the appellant has sought information on behalf of his client per se, which is not permissible”.
Quoting a Madras High Court order, the CIC underlined that “a practising advocate cannot seek information relating to the cases instituted by him on behalf of his client”. The HC had cautioned that otherwise, “every practising advocate would invoke the provisions of the RTI Act for getting information on behalf of his client”, which “does not advance the objects of the scheme of the RTI Act”. PTI
Says using the transparency law in this manner fails to advance its core objectives
Dismissing a second appeal filed by an advocate on the termination of a fruits/vegetables supply contract in Haryana, Information Commissioner Sudha Rani Relangi noted that the appellant had sought information “on behalf of his brother, who used to be supplier of vegetables/fruits to the respondent public authority”. The commission said in the absence of any explanation as to why the supplier himself could not seek the information, “it appears that the appellant has sought information on behalf of his client per se, which is not permissible”.
Quoting a Madras High Court order, the CIC underlined that “a practising advocate cannot seek information relating to the cases instituted by him on behalf of his client”. The HC had cautioned that otherwise, “every practising advocate would invoke the provisions of the RTI Act for getting information on behalf of his client”, which “does not advance the objects of the scheme of the RTI Act”. PTI
.JPG)
.JPG)
