Study Cafe: National: Friday, 17 May 2024.
RTI has revealed that the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), which deals in Fake Invoices/Fraud in the entire Gujarat, has caught only fake invoices worth approx. Rs. 4000 crore from 2017 till now and these people have spread the “raita” of GST in the name of fakes till now.
There is more disturbance than this in a big city in a year only in matters of land.
The reply of RTI is provided under:
Since 2017, GST fraud cases amount to Rs.3968.35 Crore detected, with a collection of Rs.382.47 Crores during the same period. However, the balance amount indicates the total recovery subtracted from the total amount detected. This translates to a collection percentage of 9.67% compared to the detected amount.
And also said the details of the cost of litigation are not part of any of the records/documents/reports maintained by this office. Therefore, the information sought by the applicant does not fall within the meaning of “Information” as defined under Sec 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005, being not held by any public authority.
RTI has revealed that the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), which deals in Fake Invoices/Fraud in the entire Gujarat, has caught only fake invoices worth approx. Rs. 4000 crore from 2017 till now and these people have spread the “raita” of GST in the name of fakes till now.
There is more disturbance than this in a big city in a year only in matters of land.
The reply of RTI is provided under:
Since 2017, GST fraud cases amount to Rs.3968.35 Crore detected, with a collection of Rs.382.47 Crores during the same period. However, the balance amount indicates the total recovery subtracted from the total amount detected. This translates to a collection percentage of 9.67% compared to the detected amount.
And also said the details of the cost of litigation are not part of any of the records/documents/reports maintained by this office. Therefore, the information sought by the applicant does not fall within the meaning of “Information” as defined under Sec 2(f) of the RTI Act 2005, being not held by any public authority.