Telegraph India: National: Thursday,
30 July 2020.
The
central information commissioner (CIC) has directed the law ministry to furnish
within 30 days “a clear, cogent and timely response” on an RTI application
seeking a copy of a communication addressed by the ministry to all high court
chief justices to consider SCs, STs, OBCs, minorities and women while
appointing high court judges.
There
currently is no law or enabling provision for reservation in the appointment of
judges of high courts and the Supreme Court.
The RTI
applicant, Venkatesh Nayak, had sought information from the law ministry on the
basis of an unstarred question that the minister of state for law and justice
and corporate affairs had answered on January 5, 2018, in the Rajya Sabha where
he had spoken of such a quota request to high court chief justices.
The
applicant had also sought a photocopy of the request sent by the government to
the chief justices of the high courts for ensuring the consideration of
suitable candidates from among SCs, STs, OBCs, minorities and women while
sending proposals for the appointment of judges. Nayak had also asked for photocopies
of replies received from the chief justices, if any.
In his
complaint to the CIC, Nayak had submitted that the central public information
officer (CPIC) had in a letter dated August 7, 2018, refrained from giving any
information on the ground that such matters could not be disclosed. Nayak had
then filed a statutory appeal with the law ministry’s first appellate authority
(FAA) against the officer’s refusal but did not get any response.
Allowing
Nayak’s appeal, CIC Bimal Julka in an order issued on July 23 referred to a
number of judgments of Delhi High Court and said the appellate authorities were
bound to respond to an applicant by a “speaking order” and could not ignore
responding to an appeal filed under the RTI Act against the CPIO’s order.
“Keeping
in view the facts of the case and the submissions made by the appellant and in
the light of the decisions cited above as also the provisions of the Act as per
which a clear, cogent and timely response ought to be provided by the CPIO/FAA,
the commission instructs the respondent to FAA (of the law ministry) to examine
the RTI application/ first appeal and provide a clear, cogent and precise
response to the appellant within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt
of this order depending upon the condition for containment of the coronavirus
pandemic in the country,” CIC Julka said in the order.
“The
commission also instructs the respondent public authority to convene periodic
conferences/seminars to sensitise, familiarise and educate the concerned
officials about the relevant provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, for effective
discharge of its duties and responsibilities. The appeal stands disposed
accordingly,” he added.