Myjoyonline:
Ghana: Tuesday, 10 March 2020.
It
has been one month since the government of Ghana affirmed that the newly passed
RTI is operational. Adizatu Moro Maiga of the Media Foundation for West
Africa’s Media and Good Governance programme raises red flags on deficits in
the implementation and functionality of the RTI law.
On
March 25, 2019, Parliament passed the monumental Right To Information (RTI) law
in Ghana. In the space of one month, the President assented to it, making Ghana
the tenth in West Africa to have passed the law. Thereafter, Government delayed
its implementation to January 2020, so that it could address all
infrastructural and financial requirements necessary to make the law
functional. It is now February 2020, and one is left to wonder whether the
enthusiasm and political will that characterised the RTI law’s passage is still
being maintained by the government. Against this backdrop, this article
examines five critical issues that need to be addressed if the RTI law is to be
functional in Ghana. Drawing from the examination of these issues, five
important recommendations are proffered for the attentions of the government.
Training
of Information Officers and other stakeholders
On
Sunday, February 9, 2020, Ghana’s Minister of Information, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah,
informed journalists during a press conference in Kumasi that his Ministry,
being the lead implementer of the RTI law in Ghana, has put in measures to kick-start the operationalization
of the RTI law. According to the Minister, he has given directives to all chief
directors at the various public institutions to appoint information officers
that will be responsible for receiving and processing information applications.
He also said that his outfit has shared with the various public institutions an
information request form that could be used to request for information under
the RTI law.
It
has been one month since the government of Ghana affirmed that the newly passed
RTI is operational. Adizatu Moro Maiga of the Media Foundation for West
Africa’s Media and Good Governance programme raises red flags on deficits in
the implementation and functionality of the RTI law.
On
March 25, 2019, Parliament passed the monumental Right To Information (RTI) law
in Ghana. In the space of one month, the President assented to it, making Ghana
the tenth in West Africa to have passed the law. Thereafter, Government delayed
its implementation to January 2020, so that it could address all
infrastructural and financial requirements necessary to make the law
functional. It is now February 2020, and one is left to wonder whether the
enthusiasm and political will that characterised the RTI law’s passage is still
being maintained by the government. Against this backdrop, this article
examines five critical issues that need to be addressed if the RTI law is to be
functional in Ghana. Drawing from the examination of these issues, five
important recommendations are proffered for the attentions of the government.
Training
of Information Officers and other stakeholders
On
Sunday, February 9, 2020, Ghana’s Minister of Information, Kojo Oppong Nkrumah,
informed journalists during a press conference in Kumasi that his Ministry,
being the lead implementer of the RTI law in Ghana, has put in measures to kick-start the operationalization
of the RTI law. According to the Minister, he has given directives to all chief
directors at the various public institutions to appoint information officers
that will be responsible for receiving and processing information applications.
He also said that his outfit has shared with the various public institutions an
information request form that could be used to request for information under
the RTI law.
Parliament
passed the monumental Right To Information (RTI) law in March 2019
The
Minister’s directives are laudable as Information Officers are key focal point
that serve as interface between the citizens requesting for information and the
relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies of government require to provide
timely necessary information on government’s businesses to the population. It
is therefore important for the MDAs to comply with Minister’s directive with
the appointment of Information Officers in earnest without further delay.
While
these steps by the Minister are commendable, they do not automatically
translate to the seamless functionality of the RTI law. For the RTI law to be
effective and functional, particularly as it relates to the interface between
MDAs and citizens, there ought to be adequate capacity building and training of
Information Officers and other relevant stakeholders.
Undoubtedly,
information officers are central contacts on the RTI architecture. Beyond
receiving and processing information requests and applications, information
officers also serve as resources which other officials can lean on when they
seek clarifications regarding the RTI law. Thus, the capacity building and
training should include other technical officials such as those at records and
the various departments to understand and appreciate the RTI processes and
procedural encumbrances as well as the relevance of information disclosure for
good governance and accountability in service delivery.
However,
despite the critical role play by Information Officers and other relevant
stakeholders in the information disclosure ecosystem, they have still not been
equipped with adequate capacity to take up the work. Up until now, they have
not received the requisite orientation and training that they ought to have had
before assuming their role as information officers and other technical staff on
the RTI operationalization.
It
is unfortunate that after several months following the passage of the RTI law
in Ghana, critical issues such as orienting and training information officers
and other key stakeholders on the Access to Information law is still an issue
of discussion.
Nationwide
Public Education and Sensitization on the RTI Law
An
informed citizenry, is an empowered one. The RTI law gives citizens the power
to know about governance processes and contribute to and influence government
plans, actions, policy directions and interventions. The only way citizens can
take part in this process effectively is when they are educated or sensitized
on the RTI law.
The
public education and sensitization campaign on the RTI law will advance the
understanding of the public and equip them with the necessary knowledge on how
to exercise their rights contemplated under the RTI law. This includes their
rights and obligations under the law, the processes to request information, the
duration for information processing, information exemptions and the steps to
take when information is denied among others. But so far there has not been any
nationwide educational campaign on the RTI law.
The
roadmap designed for the implementation is of the RTI law is now outdated. There is no communication on government’s
next line of action. It is also not clear what strategy government has for the
nationwide education and whether there are specific tailor-made programmes to
cater for the disadvantaged and minority in society.
Robust
Records Management System at Public Institutions
The
response of public servants to information requests in most public institutions
is one that ranges from proactively providing the information, to blaming poor
implementation on technical constraints, such as poor record management system.
Record management especially, when good, is a pre-requisite to access
information. Keeping a well-structured records system does not only improve
quality of public administration and prevent information manipulation and
destruction, but also, ease the process for information request and
accessibility.
Despite
the importance of keeping a good records system in institutions, most public
offices are not equipped to do so. They are not well-resourced to store, manage
and easily retrieve information requested by the public. A challenge that has become the norm over the
years and has been promoting corrupt practices such as payment of bribes to
expedite information disclosure and to issue administrative documents. The RTI
law, if it is to be functional, will largely depend on the proactiveness of
public institutions to have good and efficient record management systems.
Setting
up the RTI Secretariat
The
RTI Secretariat is made up of the RTI Commission, headed by the RTI
Commissioner. Setting up the RTI Commission is pivotal in the RTI ecosystem to
coordinate and support the functionality of the RTI law. Amidst the many
duties, the Commission is responsible for, is promoting the right to
information law by carrying out sustained advocacy including collaborations
with other public institutions. The Commission is also supposed to assess
implementation plans submitted by public institutions for community level
engagements. Because of these early interventions, the RTI Commission must be a
priority.
Release
of Budgetary Allocation
Funding
is perhaps the most important issue to be addressed in order to ensure proper
functioning of the RTI law in Ghana. Indeed without the necessary financial
resources, the Ministry of Information, the other public institutions as well
as the general public will not operationalize, utilize and access,
respectively, the RTI law. Training of information officers and other
stakeholders, establishment of the RTI Commission, resourcing and constituting
the Commission, making available the functional record management system as
well as rolling out the educational
campaigns cannot be achieved if the funding is not released for the
functionality of the RTI law.
Against
the foregoing, and in order to ensure that Government of Ghana is still mindful
of the RTI law’s efficacy, the following recommendations need to be taken into
consideration:
- Capacity building and Training on RTI: Information Officers in all government MDAs should be adequately trained on the RTI Law. While this training is necessary for optimal performance of the Information Officers, it should be extended to include key stakeholders such as record-keeping managers, heads of departments and other relevant actors involved in the well-functioning of the RTI laws.
- Nation-Wide Public Campaign on the RTI Law: Government should roll-out comprehensive campaign strategy to sensitize the public and advance their understanding of the RTI law. The campaign strategy must be all inclusive. This means that it must take into consideration the marginalized groups such as PWDs, people without formal education, the aged, youth, among others. This will ensure that no one is left behind in promoting good governance and accountability in the governance process. Media such as mass media, word of mouth, and availability of the RTI law in local languages as well as simplifying and developing abridged versions of the law to the various groups to further enhance public education on the RTI law.
- Robust Record Management System: Creating a robust record keeping system will not only facilitate smooth retrieval of public information but will reduce bottlenecks in accessing information on governance processes. It is also important that officers responsible for storing, managing and making public records accessible are well-resourced and empowered to facilitate the process. Advancement in technology and Software development offers opportunity that can provide easy and effective record management system in this regard.
- Setting up of the RTI Secretariat: For a well-functioning RTI regime, Government should, as matter of urgency, expedite the processes for the establishment of the RTI Commission and the appointment of the Commissioner and the resourcing of the secretariat to take up the duty of ensuring the RTI law is not only implemented but functional.
- Release of Funds: The functionality of the RTI law in Ghana to a large extent depends on government’s ability to back directives with the necessary financial resources. Government ought to release the budgetary allocation for the functioning of the RTI law in Ghana.