Economic Times: New Delhi: Wednesday, February 07, 2018.
The finance
ministry has told the Central Information Commission (CIC) that it does not
have information about the loans given to industrialist Vijay Mallya, prompting
the transparency panel to remark that the response was "vague and not
sustainable as per law".
Chief
Information Commissioner R K Mathur, while hearing the matter of one Rajiv
Kumar Khare, told the finance ministry official that the Right to Information
(RTI) application filed by the applicant should be transferred to the proper
public authority.
The finance
ministry official may have claimed that the ministry does not have information
on the loans sanctioned by different banks to Mallya or the details of the
guarantee given by Mallya against those loans, but the ministry had responded
to questions in this regard in Parliament in the past.
Union
Minister of State for Finance Santosh Gangwar had responded to a question on
Mallya on March 17, 2017, stating that the person, whose name was mentioned
(Mallya), was given a loan in September, 2004 and that it was reviewed in
February, 2008.
The Rs 8,040
crore loan was declared a non-performing asset (NPA) in 2009 and the NPA was
restructured in 2010, he had said.
"As reported
by PSBs, an amount of Rs 155 crore has been recovered by conducting a mega
online auction by selling from the seized properties from defaulting loan
borrower Vijay Mallya," Gangwar had told the Rajya Sabha on March 21.
Finance
Minister Arun Jaitley, during a debate on demonetisation in the Upper House on
November 17, 2016, had termed the loan issue of Mallya a "terrible
legacy" that the NDA government had inherited from the previous UPA
regime.
But as Khare
failed to get a response from the finance ministry to his RTI application,
seeking details of Mallya's loans, he had approached the CIC.
The term
"information" under the RTI Act means any record which is held by or
under the control of a public authority.
Khare was
initially told by the ministry that the information on Mallya's loans could not
be given because of the exemption clauses in the RTI Act related to personal
safety and prejudicial effect on the economic interest of the State.
"The
respondent (the finance ministry official) further stated that the said information
was not available with the ministry. He stated that the information sought by
the appellant might be available with the banks concerned or Reserve Bank of
India," the chief information commissioner noted.
He directed
the ministry to transfer the application to the public authority that held the
information.