The Asian Age: Mumbai: Monday, January 22, 2018.
The
allegations are based on information received under Right To Information (RTI).
The Bombay
high court has asked the Tribal Welfare department to file its reply to the
allegations by a petitioner who has alleged that the officials from the
department have siphoned off nearly Rs 1,000 crore since 2010. The allegations
are based on information received under Right To Information (RTI). The
petitioner has said that officials have spent only a small portion of the funds
and pocketed the remaining amount meant for various tribal welfare schemes in
Nashik. The court expressed surprise at the revelations and asked the
department to file a reply failing which it would ask the state tribal welfare
department secretary to attend court.
A division
bench of justices Naresh Patil and Nitin Sambre was hearing a public interest
litigation filed by Munaf Tadvi, a member of the Adivasi Bachao Andolan, an NGO
working for the uplitment of tribals living in and around Nashik. Advocate
Swapnil Valave who appeared on behalf of the petitioner informed the court that
Tadvi had stumbled upon the misappropriation when he had inquired about the use
of Rs 1.25 crore that was meant for supplying power to some of the hamlets
where the tribals lived.
He further
said that the department had installed power lines in some hamlets but there
was nothing of that sort. Mr Tadvi then filed RTI applications seeking
information on how the funds received from the centre and state was spent. That
is when he realised that nearly Rs 1000 cr funds meant for tribals had been
misappropriated in 2010 and 2011 by the project officers and the tribal welfare
department commissioner’s office.
After hearing
the submissions, the court directed the project officer to submit a detailed
report of the amount spent with details of projects and schemes where the funds
were used. The bench further warned the officer to ensure that the reply
against the allegations by the petitioner was filed by the next hearing failing
which the secretary of the department would be called.