Thursday, January 11, 2018

Activists, NGOs hit out at BMC Commissioner Ajoy Mehta for calling RTI users as 'blackmailers' and blacklisting Praja

Moneylife: Mumbai: Thursday, January 11, 2018.
Several Right to Information (RTI) activists, including former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) like Moneylife Foundation has demanded BrihanMumbai Municipal Corp (BMC) and its Commissioner Ajoy Mehta to put in public domain all application and replies provided, instead of calling RTI users as ‘blackmailers’ and blocking RTI applications from Praja, an NGO.
Mr Gandhi, in a strong worded letter sent to the BMC Commissioner, says, “For too long have RTI users and activists tolerated the arrogance, pompousness and illegal actions of public servants who wish to continue as kings and courtiers. You and BMC are consistently insulting citizens and trying to besmirch a right, which exposes the Municipal Corporation and its misdeeds.”
“RTI is a fundamental right derived from Article 19 (1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. But the BMC officials are apparently behaving in a completely illegal fashion by defaming the RTI users as blackmailers. This situation has arisen owing to the inspiration of BMC Commissioner Mr Mehta,” he added.
According to Pune-based RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar, the transparency law cannot be misused by anyone. He says, “These are completely baseless allegations that RTI is been misused. Public authorities need to fear RTI only if they have done something wrong and then only such authorities will say that the RTI activists do blackmail or extort money for their personal gains.”
In his letter, Mr Gandhi cited on records statements made by BMC officials Nidhi Choudhari and Devendra Jain. Mr Jain, who is Assistant Municipal Commissioner in BMC had filed a police compliant naming 70 citizens, majority of them RTI users, as ‘extortionists and blackmailers’. However, he could not provide any evidence and was reprimanded by the State Information Commission (SIC).
RTI activist Anil Galgali feels that public authorities are indirectly supporting RTI users. “If they do their duties for which they get paid, and follow rules and regulations, there is no need for  activists to file RTI and ask for information. These authorities are compelling citizens to use RTI because it is the only way how citizens will come to know their misdeeds. The officials, instead of blaming RTI users, needs to do an introspection,” he added.
In an order issued in October 2017, BMC Commissioner Mr Mehta allegedly declared Praja, an NGO and its employees as ‘persona non grata’, which resulted in BMC officials refusing to respond to RTI queries from the NGO, Mr Gandhi pointed out.  
Moneylife Foundation feels that all public authorities, including BMC should strictly follow Section 4 of the RTI Act and put in public domain all information mandated under the law.  
Mr Gandhi has also sent a letter to the Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis citing instances of high-handedness of BMC officials while dealing with RTI queries.
Another instance which Mr Gandhi has shared in the letter is related with Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) set up by the BMC. “The TAC suggested many actions to increase transparency and accountability. Some of these were putting all the building files, data from your SAP system, complaints, RTI applications and their responses, permissions for road repairs on your website, and making the website user friendly and faster. There were many more, most of which were not followed. In fact, when the TAC started insisting on its recommendations being followed you disbanded it in an uncouth manner. I might point out that if RTI applications and responses were put on the website, no blackmailing could occur. All the transparency measures have been outlined in Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT)’s office memorandum and have been reiterated in Maharashtra Government Resolution (GR). “Despite DoPT’s OM, State Government’s GR, and TAC follow up, the BMC resolutely refuses to follow the requirements of the RTI Act and defies all of these. Since TAC was actively pursuing these and pointing out the huge gaps you took a decision to disband it. If these transparency measures had been followed, BMC would have gained citizen’s respect and better governance would have been possible. I agree that there would have been a huge reduction in the bribes and the corruption revenue would have taken a downturn,” says Mr Gandhi.