Greater Kashmir: Srinagar: Thursday, August 17, 2017.
The SIC in
its order in the second appeal in the case titled Ghulam Mohammad Wani v/s
executive engineer Hydraulic Circle, Bandipora has observed that “the conduct
of the FAA has been in violation of the provisions of the RTI Act” which lays
down clearly the duties of FAA under Section 16 of the ACT.
The State
Information Commission (SIC) has taken a serious view of the absence of the
superintending engineer (Hydraulics), Sopore, who is the First Appellate
Authority (FAA) for Hydraulic Division, Bandipora, in the hearing on August 9,
2017.
The SIC in
its order in the second appeal in the case titled Ghulam Mohammad Wani v/s
executive engineer Hydraulic Circle, Bandipora has observed that “the conduct
of the FAA has been in violation of the provisions of the RTI Act” which lays
down clearly the duties of FAA under Section 16 of the ACT. The observation
added that duties of the FAA under Section 16 of the RTI Act include acting in
a quasi-judicial manner and giving an opportunity and proper hearing to the
aggrieved appellant but the SE Hydraulics Sopore has failed to perform the said
duties under the provisions of the RTI Act.
The SIC has
made similar observations about the absence of FAAs and PIOs in the appeals
titled Abdul Qayoom v/s PIO/SHO Police Station, Awantipora; Mohammad Musa v/s
Commandant IRP 18thBattalion, Reshipora, Shopian; Prof Abdul Gani Bhat v/s PIO,
J&K High Court; and Javaid Ahmad Bhat v/s NCC.