The News Minute: National: Saturday, August 26, 2017.
The draft
notification allowed for businesses to run without obtaining prior environmental
clearance just by paying a fine.
Facing
opposition from citizens, the Centre has scrapped a draft notification which
allowed businesses to run without obtaining prior environmental clearance by
just paying a fine.
Earlier in
March, the controversial Environment Supplemental Plan (ESP) was withdrawn
after the Ministry of Environment and Forests received more than 25,000
comments. Most of them opposed the decision, the government said.
This came to
light in a Right to Information reply to Jhatkaa, a non-profit campaigning
organisation.
“The RTI
response clearly mentioned that the ESP was scrapped because it received over
25,000 comments primarily opposing the idea, out of which over 2000 of which
can be tracked directly to Jhatkaa members. This is a huge victory because it
helps ensure the integrity of the current environmental clearance process! It
is extremely encouraging to know that the ministry has taken feedback from
citizens very seriously in this case. It clearly shows that when issue experts,
campaigners and citizens work together, we can even move the MoEFCC. This is
how democracy should work,” said Tania Devaiah, former senior campaigner of
Jhatkaa.org, who led the campaign at the time.
“When we read
the government’s ESP draft notification, we knew it would be a disaster for our
environment. We worked with issue experts like Advocate Ritwick Dutta, Kanchi
Kohli and Manju Menon from CPR-Namati Environment Justice Program, and Terence
Jorge from the EIA Resource and Response Centre (ERC) to help us understand and
simplify this report for our members. When our members realised what this
proposal meant and the small window of opportunity that the comments period
offered, they did not hold back,” Devaiah added.
Earlier
itself, in March, the environment ministry issued a fresh notification
replacing the ESP idea with a one time, six-month window for project proponents
who had not received environmental clearance to apply for post-facto clearance.
This proposal
also came under scrutiny from the Madras High Court and was stayed.
