Saturday, April 01, 2017

Info panel fined 68 officers

Times of India: Gandhinagar: Saturday, April 01, 2017.
The Gujarat Information Commissioner received 8,449 appeals and complaints in the year 2015-16. The commission reported that of the 8,449 application received 7,525 appeals that were disposed of and a penalty was imposed in 68 cases.
The commission reported that of the 7,371 appeals that were disposed of, penalty was imposed in 66 cases.As for the 154 complaints, penalty was imposed only in 2 cases. In the total 68 cases where officers were fined, the GIC had recovered Rs 5.95 lakh as penalty.
The commission reported that there was a marginal increase in the number of appeals and complaints received as compared to 2014-15 when the commission had received 8361 appeals and complaints.
The annual report of the GIC tabled in the assembly on Friday said that in 2015-16, of the total 8,449 cases, only 3.6% were complaints while 96.40% were appeals. The commission disposed of 7371 appeals and complaints. The commission on an average disposed of 26 cases per day.
The report further states that the Revenue Department, along with Urban Development and Urban Housing Department, were the two departments against whom the highest number of appeals and complaints were filed. Around 27.29% of the appeals and complaints were filed against these two departments.
During the year 2015-16, the public authorities working under various department received 1.52 lakh applications. Of these, only 5,599 were received directly by the department concerned. Similarly, of the total 1.52 lakh application, around 48% were received directly by the Revenue Department and Urban Development and Urban Housing Department.
The commission reported that of the 7,371 appeals that were disposed of, penalty was imposed in 66 cases.As for the 154 complaints, penalty was imposed only in 2 cases. In the total 68 cases where officers were fined, the GIC had recovered Rs 5.95 lakh as penalty.
The GIC has noted in its report that the commission had directed the state government to ensure strict and effective implementation of proactive disclosure by every public authority.
The commission had also directed that the Sardar Patel Institute of Public Administration should carry out the training of officials handling RTI applications. The commission has also recommended that all the first appellate authorities of the state perform their duties and responsibilities under the RTI act with utmost care and seriousness.