Thursday, October 13, 2016

India way behind in effective implementation of RTI Act

Times of India: Kochi: Thursday, October 13, 2016.
Though the country celebrates the 11th anniversary of the inception of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, India is ranked 66 out of the 102 countries surveyed by the World Justice Project for the efficiency in the Act's enactment.
In the state, presently all five posts of information commissioners, which are to be mandatorily filled, are vacant. Only a single chief information commissioner mans the entire team, instead of a six-member board.
"Over 13,200 cases are pending state-wide due to the acute understaffed status quo of the information commission. Of the cases that are forwarded to the chief information commissioner, 1000 files are pending," said Vinson M Paul, state chief information commissioner.
Paul said that a court case was filed by the National Campaign for People's Right to Information (NCPRI) so as to look into unfilled vacancies.
"The high court had issued an order in November 2015, to complete the process of appointments to the vacant posts within six weeks of the date of production of a copy of the judgement. However, it's almost a year since the judgement and not even a single vacancy has been filled yet. We are to file a contempt of court case against the chief secretary of the secretariat," said M T Thomas, member of NCPRI state committee.
A list of five prospective appointees was refused by the governor. Accordingly, the court ordered the state government to appoint those who were shortlisted by the selection committee as information commissioners, while UDF was in power. However, no action has been taken.
Shailesh Gandhi, former central information commissioner said that 54% of the RTIs filed are queries for information that are to be published suo motu by respective government organizations, which points to the callous lookout to the RTI by those in charge of the implementation.
"The appointing of information commissioners are to be done with people who have a predilection for transparency. However, the trend shows that the appointments are made on the basis of political dispositions because RTI challenges the power of the powerful," Gandhi said.
Abey George, state convener of NCPRI said that 60 % of responses to the RTIs filed by the public are given in one word or one sentence replies by the public information officers by zeroing in on the flaws in framing the question.
"The PIOs are supposed to help even an illiterate person to file intelligible questions. However, they are so bent on finding loopholes to the answers that only a few bright minds can avail information by framing questions that rules out any loop holes," George said.