Monday, October 17, 2016

Illegal structures: Cops may not need civic nod to prosecute

Times of India‎‎‎‎: Mumbai: Monday, October 17, 2016.
In order to expedite prosecution against those booked for illegal constructions, the state government plans to amend the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning (MRTP) Act to do away with the civic body’s nod to sanction prosecution in such cases. The government has also proposed to make it compulsory for the police to file a charge sheet in 90 days.
At present, under Section 142 of the Act, police need the civic body’s nod to proceed, though it is the municipal corporation/council that files cases for MRTP Act violations with the police.
“If a civic body or any planning body registers an FIR, it means they want action initiated against the violator. Why then should there be a requirement for sanctioning prosecution?” said a senior official from the urban development department.
There are several instances of the civic body refusing permission to the police and regularizing violations after imposing penalties on offenders. A source said that on several occasions, the MRTP Act has also been misused to put pressure on the offenders in exchange for bribes.
An official said that the police have repeatedly complained that once the civic body files a complaint, it drags its feet over the case, which in turn reflects badly on the police statistics.
Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the police had said that if a civic body does not decide in three months on whether to prosecute an accused, the police will automatically initiate action under the MRTP Act.
On the matter of charge sheets, an official said, “The home department already has guidelines on filing charge sheets in different kinds of cases. We will check if there are specifications for cases under the MRTP Act. If not, this clause will be added.” He said that sometimes cases keep pending for years for want of a charge sheet, and offenders get stay orders from courts.
Mayor, RTI activist welcome move
Nagpur mayor Pravin Datke welcomed the move but wished the police department do not misuse the proposed powers. “Action against violators should be taken promptly. Sometimes, the civic body has to lodge a complaint with the police under pressure or consistent demand from an individual or organization. NMC wants proper investigation and hence it approaches the police so that any innocent should not fall victim to false complaints,” he said.
In many cases, neither stringent action like demolition of unauthorized constructions or layouts is initiated nor notices are served. There are over 1,500 cases in which notices under MRTP Act are issued but no action taken. The two civic authorities had lodged complaint with the police in very few cases.
RTI activist TH Naidu said it was a good move and will prevent from violations of MRTP Act in future. “It is a routine practice at the NMC and NIT to regularize unauthorized constructions and layouts recovering compounding charges and regularization charges. There are few cases in which NMC and NIT lodged complaint with police but did not give permission of prosecution citing unauthorized constructions and layouts regularized or faced action of demolition etc,” Naidu said.
Best examples are Purti Super Bazaar constructed in the parking space of Scientific Society Hall at Aath Rasta Square, commercial use of parking space at Tajshree Honda at Deo Nagar, Scientific Society's unauthorized banquet hall constructed on playground etc.