Times of India: Chennai: Friday, October 07, 2016.
Though the
Right to Information Act (RTI) is a powerful law, in Tamil Nadu it is being
used more to address grievances than to ask for information, said chief
information commissioner K Ramanujam on Thursday. He suggested that all
government departments set up help desk in their offices to reduce the huge
number of such RTI queries. "Another option can be to list the Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQs) on your website."
Speaking at a
workshop organised by the Tamil Nadu State Information Commission (TNSIC) at
the Anna Institute of Management (AIM), Ramanujam said, "There is a vast
difference in perception between information seekers and givers about what
constitutes information. This creates a dissatisfaction or disaffection among
RTI applicants. In my opinion, the Act should have been named the Right to
Copies and Records Act,"
Ramanujam
produced statistics collected from government departments which showed that
between 2010 and 2014, 16.25 lakh RTI applications were filed. Of these, 32 per
cent were filed with the revenue department, 17 per cent with the home
department, seven per cent with the rural development department six per cent
with schools.
"Fifty
per cent of the RTI applications filed with the revenue and home departments
are not only because people want to expose corruption. It's also because here
people use the RTI more to redress grievances," Ramanujam said.
For probably
the first time, a large number of RTI applicants, public information officers
(PIOs) from state government departments and members of civil society like
advocates were invited for the day-long session. Retired Madras high court
judge Justice K Chandru and vice-chancellor of TN Ambedkar Law University P
Vanangamudi participated in the sessions.
Apart from
presentations on case studies, there were talks by RTI activists like R
Natarajan and Sai Yashodharan and PIOs like S Rajendran from the AIM and K
Razeeya from the commercial taxes department. Each person spoke about the
challenges with respect to the RTI Act from their perspective; Ramanujam
offered the SIC's perspective.