Economic Times: New Delhi: Thursday,
October 06, 2016.
Every day
4,800 applications are filed to access information from the government across
India. The first decadal study conducted after Right to Information (RTI) Act
implemented in October 2005 has revealed that over 1.75 crore applications have
been filed with one-fourth being requests to the Centre.
Astudy
conducted by Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), exclusively accessed
by ET, reveals that 27.2% (47.66 lakh) of the total RTIs filed between 2005 and
2015 were to the different ministries and departments under the Centre.
Maharashtra
finishes a close second with 26.40% (46.26 lakh) of the applications being submitted
in the same time period.
Karnataka
government received 11.83% (20.73 lakh) applications. The top three Centre,
Maharashtra and Karnataka governments received two-thirds or 65.43% of the RTI
applications filed by Indians in the last 10 years.
The data
attains significance as there is no official record of the total number of RTI
applications received in India even as RTI Act enters its 12th year of
implementation on October 12.
The study
conducted by CHRI’s Sneha Chandna reveals that southern states account for a
quarter of RTIs received. Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Kerala
received almost a quarter 24.90% of the RTI applications submitted across the
country.
The study
also points to less frequent use of RTI Act by the northeastern states. While
Meghalaya received 11,092 requests in 2005-15 Nagaland government received
16,009 requests.
CHRI’s
Venkatesh Nayak says, “The number of RTI applications needs to reduce. For
this, the governments need to identify frequently asked questions and proactively
disclose that information.
The
governments also must fulfill their obligations of spreading awareness about
RTI with particular focus on the disadvantaged segments of society.”
The study
points out that the actual number of RTI applications could be higher since
many public authorities do not report their annual compliance, the number of
applications filed with them does not get accounted for, Nayak explained,
“Under Section 25 of RTI Act, all public authorities under Centre and state
governments are required to submit annual status of implementation to
information commissions.
But
compliance with the statutory requirement has been poor. Also, the information
commissions follow disparate cycles of annual reporting some follow calendar
year and some adopt the financial year reporting cycle.”
The state
information commissions, the final appellate authorities in the states for RTI Act,
also have been playing truant as far as their responsibilities are concerned.
The study has
found that basic responsibilities of publishing annual reports and having
functional websites are not followed by the state commissions.
Four state
information commissions Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Tripura and Uttar Pradesh have
not published any annual report on their website.
Information
commissions of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh have been reporting state statistics
erratically. The information commission of Goa does not have a functional
website, the study says.