Thursday, August 04, 2016

Capital construction: Expert faults Swiss Challenge method

The Hindu‎‎: Vijaywada: Thursday, August 04, 2016.
The outright rejection of the recommendations of the Sivaramakrishnan committee on the construction of the capital city of Andhra Pradesh came in for severe criticism by M.G. Devasahayam who was a former IAS officer of the 2nd phase construction of Chandigarh city in the 1950s.
The bid submitted by the Ascendas-Singbridge-led consortium was not unsolicited. It should have been an unsolicited or a suo motu proposal but it was not, which makes the developer agreement that the GoAP had signed void ab initio (from the beginning), he asserted.
Addressing a seminar on ‘Construction of Amaravati - the consequences of Swiss Challenge’ organised by the Tax Payers’ Association here on Wednesday, Mr. Devasahayam said the Singapore companies had sought a ‘State guarantee’ for their stakes against the norms.
Amaravati does not require more than 6,000 acres of land and it should have been planned at a place where a large-scale dislocation of agricultural activity could be avoided. Unfortunately, the capital city project has already dealt a severe blow to horticulture in 29 villages. “The Government of AP (GoAP) has blatantly violated all laws right from the selection of the place to awarding the works to a foreign consortium and inviting counter proposals through the Swiss Challenge system. The Krishna delta, which is one of the finest I have seen, is going to be destroyed unless the government takes corrective action at least now. Otherwise, people are going to face a major crisis,” he added.