Times of India: Aurangabad: Tuesday,
June 14, 2016.
A few
minority community students of the Government Institute of Science have
demanded access to their practical assessment marks under the Right to
Information (RTI) Act.
The students,
who have completed their master's in Geology, have accused their teachers of
deliberately giving them poor marks in internal assessment even though they had
performed well.
As per the
RTI rules, only theory papers can be accessed.
"While I
secured relatively good marks in theory papers, I was allotted poor marks in
internal assessment. My fellow classmates got good marks though. To prove that
we have been targeted by a section of our faculty, we need access to practical
assessment marks under the RTI Act," said a student, requesting anonymity.
Besides oral
examination, the internal assessment also involved drawing of graphs, spotting
the object and some descriptive answers among other exercises.
The aggrieved
students claimed that poor internal marks have reduced their overall pass
percentage drastically, affecting their career prospects.
"My pass
percentage has gone below 55%, making me ineligible for NET-SET or Ph.D
entrance examination of different universities,"said another affected
student.
Hemlata
Wankhede, director of the Government Institute of Science, said head of the
Geology department was in the know of the situation.
Department
head K M Wanjarwadkar said the college faculty did not have a role in the
assessment of students. The same was done by external examiners.
"As far
as access to practical work under RTI Act is concerned, the assessment has been
already submitted to the university. The varsity officials can take a call and
decide the merit in allegations levelled by students," said Wanjarwadkar.
Digambar
Netke, officiating controller of examination (CoE) of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar
Marathwada University (BAMU), could not be reached for a comment. Senior
university officials said only theory papers are handed over to students under
the RTI Act as per the laid down rules.
It may be
noted that the students had complained about not receiving photocopy of their
answersheet even if more than two months had lapsed to making necessary
applications. The students had accused the college of delay on its part in the
whole process, but college authorities had refused the charge.