Times of India: Mumbai: Sunday,
June 12, 2016.
Of about
7,700 complaints filed by Mumbaikars with the anti-corruption bureau (ACB) over
the last three-and-a-half years, most appear to be vague or bogus. The ACB has
found only about 500 plaints (more than 6%) substantial enough to order an
inquiry, shows the reply to an RTI query.
Information
got under RTI by activist Jeetendra Ghadge states the Mumbai division of ACB
received 7,675 complaints from the public between January 1, 2013, and April
28, 2016, but only 512 open or discreet inquiries were ordered and subsequently
seven FIRs registered. As many as 236 open and discreet inquiries were still
found pending with the ACB during the same period.
Ghadge
alleges a lackadaisical approach on the part of a section of ACB officials in
taking complaints forward.
However,
director general of ACB Satish Mathur said he was ready to put all complaints
received in public domain so that people know if they are worth taking forward.
"I am ready if anyone proved they were worth it... Some of these
complaints are copies of grievances simply marked to the ACB," he said.
Another
senior ACB official said they have no option but to give up on vague
applications which are mostly bogus. "Mostly, we forward such complaints
to departments concerned as in rare cases we find corroborative material,"
said the official.
However,
Ghadge blames it on ignorance on the part of a section of ACB officials as
according to him, thousands of applications were sent to the respective
departments from where complaints originated.
Ghadge
reminded of his old RTI wherein ACB had sent back as many as 4,781 corruption
complaints to the departments concerned between September 2009 and November
2013, a move that implied that the departments and colleagues of the accused
were also the judges. Remarks of department heads or departmental probes are
then considered while deciding the line of action which may adversely affect
investigations.
It may be
mentioned that the Bombay high court had directed the ACB to probe every
complaint instead of merely passing it on to the departments where the alleged
corruptions have taken place. While ACB officials justify the act, saying that
sending back matters to departmental vigilance squads was as per conduct,
ex-police officers and experts attributed the situation to apathy of the home
department who they said did not want to the ACB force by increasing staff and
machinery.