Sunday, April 17, 2016

Democracy and secrecy

The Echo of India‎‎‎‎‎‎: Editorial: Sunday, April 17, 2016.
The Centre is drawing up a list of officials, irrespective of their ranks, who will handle top secret files. The decision, says a The Hindu report, was taken after several ‘leaks’ were found to have occurred. A democratic society is, by its very nature, an open society. The functioning of the government should be open to public scrutiny except in some select matters like defence, nuclear research, etc. Most ‘secrets’ that governments tend to hold close to their chest are, in fact, information that will embarrass the ruling party of the day. The Netaji files are an instance. The people were being told for decades that declassification of these files would have serious repercussions on India’s relations with some foreign countries. A large number of these files have since been declassified – both by the Bengal Government and the Centre. But nothing earth-shaking has come out, except that successive Congress Governments at the centre had kept members of Netaji’s family under surveillance.
The current India-US strategic dialogue has raised concern about the scope and extent of defence ‘cooperation’ between the two countries: whether what is being contemplated will compromise India’s foreign and defence policies and push India into a cold-war with China. China is certainly not acting like a good friend and neighbour of India. The threat from China is real. This requires that India attain the capability to defend itself on its own against any military misadventure by any of its neighbours, not just China. But that does not necessarily mean that India should abandon her independent foreign and defence policies and dovetail these to the policies of a big Power and become subservient to it. Keeping such sensitive matters under the blanket in the name of secrecy will not be in national interest. These should be brought into the public domain and debated nationally.
Secrecy and openness stand in inverse ratio to each other. Excessive secrecy tends to make the government less and less accountable to the people. In the United States there is the practice of top officials appearing before concerned committees of the Congress from time to time for briefing and giving its members a full report. Many unsavoury facts came out that way. India’s legacy, since the colonial period, has been to treat everything as top secret. Even the RTI Act has largely failed to break this tradition. It is time the government started taking the people into confidence. There should be a mechanism to share information regarding really sensitive and confidential matters with Members of Parliament.