Times
of India: Panaji: Wednesday, 24 February 2016.
The new Goa
state information commission panel with Prashant S P Tendolkar as the state
chief information commissioner, Pratima K Vernekar and Juino De Souza as state
information commissioners, has disposed of 40 matters since they were inducted
into the commission on January 1 this year. The commission has taken it upon
itself to dispose of cases pending for the past nine years and the 40 matters
disposed of include cases filed between the years 2007-2010.
Over 1,500
cases were pending before the commission when the new panel took over. A
considerable amount of time has been spent on issuing notices to parties, some
of whom have moved residence and even passed away. In other cases parties have
received information requested for under the RTI and aren't interested in
pursuing the cases anymore. "We can't go ahead with hearings without
issuing notices and granting fair appearance to the parties," Tendolkar
said. The speed of disposal of cases is expected to increase in the coming
weeks now that a large number of notices have already been issued. The
commission plans to club cases relating to each department so that public
information officers needn't leave their offices repeatedly to appear for
cases. This system will be put in place in June and is applicable only to new
cases.
A majority of
the cases filed before the commission pertain to the departments of PWD,
electricity, town and country planning and panchayats.
The
commission directed the director cum administrator cum manager of Sharada
Mandir Trust to furnish the audited statement of accounts for the years
2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 to the directorate of education stating that the
school run by the trust was a recognized school under the Goa Education Act
with the levy of its fees and charges controlled and regulated by the
government under the Education Act. Despite it being an unaided school its
audited statements are required to be filed as a condition for obtaining and
retaining recognition of the school and it cannot claim immunity under the
Right to Information Act, on the grounds that it is not a public authority, the
commission stated in its order.