The
Hindu: Kochi: Sunday, 06 December 2015.
A recent
circular by the State government asking all heads of departments, public sector
undertakings and District Collectors to furnish information regarding the
difficulties faced by the public information officers while enforcing the Right
to Information (RTI) Act has invited the ire of RTI activists.
The circular
has been issued by the General Administration (Coordination) Department. The
circular says that the views and information have been sought in view of the
decision taken by the Committee of Subordinate Legislation of Parliament to
amend the Act “to bring transparency in the functioning of government bodies
and to expose malpractices, if any, in the system.”
The
department has sought consolidated details, including the difficulties
encountered by the government departments on account of irrelevant or fake
applications and suggestions to overcome such difficulties. That apart, data on
the number of applications received, replies given and appeals before the
Information Commission have also been sought.
The
amendments to the RTI Act has been mooted in the wake of the June 3, 2013,
verdict of the Central Information Commission holding that political parties
came under the ambit of the definition of public authorities and hence under
the purview of the RTI Act. D.B. Binu, general secretary, RTI Federation of
Kerala, opposing the amendments, pointed out that the circular which did not
seek the opinions of stakeholders, including civil society, RTI activists and
non-governmental organisations, was undemocratic and totally against the spirit
of the Act. He said that what was even more shocking was the fact that the
Committee of Subordinate Legislation of Parliament was not empowered to make amendments
to the Act. The power of the committee was only recommendatory in nature.
V.V. Giri,
former State Information Commissioner, said the government could have sought
opinion from the stakeholders as well. He also wondered what the government
meant by irrelevant and fake applications. There was an earlier move to include
frivolous and vexatious grounds in the Act to reject RTI applications. However,
it was strongly resisted. Mr. Giri expected the committee to hold sittings in
various places to seek the views and suggestions of stakeholders.