Indian
Express: Pune: Friday, 04 December 2015.
THE POWER to
penalise erring officials by far is the most potent weapon with the information
commissioner to ensure the proper implementation of the RTI Act. However, this
very power is under threat in Maharashtra, with only 14 per cent of the total
fines being realised from the salaries of the officers whom the State
Information Commissioners (SIC) had levied penalties on.
In case a
Public Information Officer (PIO) or an Appellate Authority (AA) fails to
provide information within stipulated time or fails to give required
information, the SIC has the power to fine such officer. The maximum quantum of
the fine is set at Rs 25,000 with the RTI Act stipulating that the fine would
be recovered from the salaries of the officers fined. Compliance of the the
same has to be provided to the SIC’s offices. The ‘Damocles sword of fine’ is
the most important provision in the Act, which makes sure officers follow the
stipulated time period in the Act to provide information.
The 9th
Annual report of the State Information Commission shows that last year the
total quantum of fine levied on errant officials was Rs 42, 37,00. The
compliance report about the realisation of the fines showed only Rs 6,14,500
was recovered. Terming this a matter of serious concern, the SIC’s report said,
“The responsibility of recovering the fines from the salaries of the PIOs and
AAs is with the Pay and Accounts officers of the respective offices. It is
their duty to see to the compliance of the fines is carried out in totality.”
Annual
reports of the previous years have also talked about similar non compliance.
For the year 2013, the total quantum of fine slapped was Rs 56,11,000 while the
total fine slapped during 2012 was Rs 38,08,500, major portions of both were
unrecovered. The Annual report of the SICs have been making reference to the
non recovery of the fines and termed it as a serious impediment to the
implementation of the RTI Act.
City-based
RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar said, the SICs themselves can ensure the compliance
of their order without depending on the Pay and Accounts officers. “Under the
RTI Act, the SICs can recognise the head of the office as a public authority.
It is the duty of the Public Authority to ensure that all orders passed by the
SIC is followed,” he said. Kumbhar said the reluctance of the SICs to do so was
one of the main reasons the fines levied were not recovered from the salaries
of the fined officers.