Times
of India: New Delhi: Wednesday, 18 November 2015.
The NDA
government has decided to stick to its suggestions submitted to the apex court
earlier and not make any fresh submission on improvement of the Supreme Court's
collegium system. The matter is listed for hearing in the SC on Wednesday.
The
government has already emphasized on making the system more transparent and
suggested selection of judges through a consultative exercise involving the
executive.
A five-judge
SC bench will hear from Wednesday all suggestions received by the law ministry
on improving the collegium system. The ministry has received at least 2,000
email responses which it has submitted to a two-member SC committee.
The
government had suggested executive participation before finalization of
recommendations. It suggested that before the names were finalized for
appointment as high court judges, the HC must consult the chief minister of the
state.
Another
suggestion was that only names cleared by the Intelligence Bureau (IB) should
be considered for appointment. "An IB report regarding the candidates must
be obtained before the name is sent by the HC collegium to the SC. Only
candidates whose names are cleared should be sent to the SC," it had said.
As of now, no
consultation is required with the political class before the collegium makes
its recommendations. Only after the SC collegium makes a final recommendation
does the Centre seeks the governor's and CM's comments.
Similar to the
provisions in the NJAC, the government has proposed a permanent secretariat for
the collegium in the SC and in each of the HCs.
The proposed
secretariat, according to the Centre's suggestion, should have a full-time
senior officer in-charge and other staff as necessary, similar to what was
there in the NJAC. The secretariat's responsibilities would include collection
of background information about members of the bar and district court judges
who are to be appointed.
The
government has also suggested bringing the collegium under the RTI Act where
all information related to selection of judges can be made public to bring
transparency in the appointment process.