India
Today: New Delhi: Wednesday, 02 September 2015.
A Supreme
Court order makes it mandatory for forest departments to create a fund in which
money received from agencies, which seek cutting of trees, is kept.
The Central
Information Commission (CIC) has said forest departments in states must
disclose how funds for afforestation were being used, besides the species and
locations of saplings being planted.
Drawing from
agencies allowed to cut trees for infrastructure projects, states have put
together a corpus of Rs 35,000 crore, but only a small part of it is being
released, for which it was collected, Mail Today has learnt.
Information
Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu, in a recent order, told the Delhi forest department
to make public species-wise information about compensatory afforestation for
every quarter, with details of amount available and those spent on
re-plantation.
The CIC was
hearing an appeal filed by conservation biologist Sajid Idrisi, whose RTI application
seeking from the Delhi forest department the number of trees allowed to be cut
for infrastructure projects in Delhi between 2004 and 2014, failed to get the
desired information.
Idrisi also
wanted to know the species of trees cut during the period and the species and
locations of saplings planted to make up for the green loss. The Delhi High
Court recently asked the Delhi government to disclose the number of trees cut
and the number of saplings planted and where the greening fund has gone.
Acharyulu
said in his order: "People have the right to know how this money is being
spent. It is the duty of the forest department to inform the appellant about
the measures taken to compensate cutting of trees. The department has a duty to
assess the loss and efforts to compensate. For that purpose, they have to
maintain species-wise records of compensatory afforestation."
The
Commission directed the forest department to furnish the information for
2010-2015 to the appellant within 15 days. For the remaining years, the
information is to be furnished within three months.
A Supreme
Court order makes it mandatory for forest departments in states to create a
fund in which money received from agencies which seek cutting of trees is to be
kept. Apart from re-plantation, this fund is also to be used in forest and
wildlife conservation. But only a small part of this Rs 35,000 crore fund is
being released for the purpose it was collected.
Idrisi told
Mail Today: "Maintaining species-specific records is important because
different species attain different canopy sizes. Therefore specific distance
has to be maintained between saplings during plantation. Habitat requirements
also differ from species to species. The number of trees cut if not replaced by
new trees at similar habitats will lead affect green cover and
biodiversity."