Times of India: Lucknow: Monday, August 03, 2015.
Contending
that the RTI Act is meant to ensure transparency and accountability by allowing
common man to have information in larger public interest and no way it should
create a stumbling block in the functioning of the government, the state
information commission disposed a bunch of cases filed by a research scholar against
Lucknow University authorities.
Information
commissioner Arvind Singh Bisht said in his order that the applicant, Saurabh
Gupta, filed as many as 41 RTI applications seeking mostly information about
PhD admissions, nominations and upgradations.
The
commission clubbed all the applications to take a holistic view and avoid
issuing different orders on appeals which were of similar nature. The
commission observed that Gupta went on filing a barrage of RTI applications
after the LU authorities refused to grant him upgrdation from a junior research
fellow to senior research fellow citing anomalies in his papers.
Citing a
Supreme Court that 'impractical demands of directions under the RTI Act for
disclosure of all and sundry information would be counter-productive', the
commission said "while the university had a settled view that the
applicant could not be granted the SRF upgradation, the applicant apparently
appeared to have taken offence and nursed its grudge against it...this was
neither ethically correct nor permissible under the provisions of the RTI
Act."