Sunday, March 22, 2015

Corruption and impunity : Aarif Qadir

Rising Kashmir: Srinagar: Sunday, 22 March 2015.
Unveiling the daunting cases of political bribery is always dangerous. But one should not fear to write about truth. Truth may attract the wrath of those who indulge in forgery and fraud but those who are against it may stand as recourse.
While teaching synonyms, I would use Conflict-Corruption-Kashmir as an epitome. The state has earned the title ‘one of the most corrupt states of India’ and the untiring continual struggle of politicians in earning my state this title should never be underestimated. The campaign to make the Valley, the so called “Reshi waer”, touch the new heights in the field of political corruption is believed to have been egged way back in 70s when Sheikh Abdullah reassumed the power.
“Lal Kitab” (Red Book), a booklet published during 1980s, highlighted some of the severe acts of corruption committed by the Sheikh dynasty. It was alleged that he allotted the highly priced government land illegally to his family and relatives at Gupkar after returning to power in 1975. The former governor of the state Jagmohan went on to say that political corruption acquired new fangs and depths in Kashmir after 1977.
Well, if this is the story, why do we commoners blame the current stalwarts of corruption in the state? The common saying, “Sins aren’t inherited” will not be applicable to the legalised corruption as it is not a virtual sin. And if any Tom, Harry and Dick like the former army General of the country raise allegations and disclose the stunning facets of political corruption operating within the state, why should the state administration take the action? To them, he is a child who can scream foul anytime. Or else, he dislikes the Kashmiri politicians personally or tries to get a political mileage in the state politics. All of us are mature enough to filter the truth out of these two assumptions; we can’t squeeze water to get cheese. They couldn’t take the action as it would’ve stained the character of their own ministers. This is petty politics at its worst.
One finds nothing to wonder when he observes the graph of criminalisation and corruption in politics never descending. This is attributed to the state’s inability to take action against the tainted. Now, if a minister is caught into a controversy and found guilty of paying bribe to facilitate the success of his son who didn’t sit in the examination isn’t sacked, how can you expect the ever-ascending graph of political corruption to descend? And if he isn’t deprived of the power, what else will follow? The corrupt politicians become more committed to spread this malignancy to more parts, more fields, with more strength and for more time. In order to distract the public and to show them they are against corruption, they suggest the guilty to resign. A few days after the resignation, finding the public unmindful, they recall the tainted minister and give him the new portfolio. Thereafter, the acts of corruption are done in a more cautious way with meagre chances of getting exposed and this is the stage where this royal sin stagnates.
There are too many examples from all political parties. The leaders are leading from the front. The need of the hour is to quash the corrupt power for ever. We have at our disposal the Right to Information (RTI), but the problem is that it can only expose. The action was supposed to be taken by the government, but that’s comprised of the politicians. We could change this worst case scenario by the franchise but the problem is that of the alternative.
All said we can’t generalize. There are of course certain politicians who are real social servants and who dream of a corruption-free Kashmir. But at the same time, we can’t exclude the possibilities of a man contracting flu while living in the company of infected; the saying, ‘One dirty fish spoils the whole pond’. The need of an hour is that the government makes stringent laws against political corruption. The heads of political parties be selective while choosing and providing mandate to the candidates. We will be rich only when our leaders are rich at heart.