Over 10,000 RTI appeals pending

The Hindu: New Delhi: Tuesday, 25 November 2014.

When the new Chief Information Commissioner is appointed, he or she will find a mammoth 10,000 Right To Information appeals already pending before him or her. The new government’s delay in appointing a new Chief has led to pendency shooting up, much of it surrounding new policy decisions taken by the government.

The Chief Information Commissioner heads the Central Information Commission, the body which hears appeals from information-seekers who have not been satisfied by the public authority they are seeking information from, and major issues concerning the RTI Act. Since August 22, when Chief Information Commissioner Rajiv Mathur retired, the government has not appointed a new Chief. Instead of convening a meeting and promoting the seniormost commissioner, the NDA government in the last week of October advertised for a new Chief. Monday was the last day for applications.

RTI activist Commodore (retd.) Lokesh K. Batra filed a query with the Central Information Commission, asking how many cases had been pending before the Chief as on August 23 and as on November 22. The CIC in its reply said that 10,290 cases were pending. “At this rate, people are going to lose faith in the commission and in the Act,” Mr. Batra told The Hindu.

Over a third of cases involve appeals against the Ministry of Defence alone.

Reflecting recent news development, there has been a big rise in the number of appeals against the Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Human Resource Development, the University Grants Commission, the Central Board of Secondary Education and the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan.

The Chief Information Commissioner is to be appointed by the President on the recommendation of a three-member committee headed by the Prime Minister and including the Leader of Opposition and a Union Cabinet Minister to be nominated by the Prime Minister. “All that it needed was for the meeting to be called and appointment made,” Nikhil Dey of the National Campaign for the People’s Right To Information said. “The appointment was not held up by the lack of a Leader of the Opposition, because the RTI Act clearly states that the leader of the single largest opposition is also acceptable. If transparency had mattered to the government, they would have made the appointment a priority,” he said.

Former central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi has long said that rising pendency is killing the landmark Act. “When I was in the CIC, we decided that we would dispose of a minimum of 3,200 cases per year. I myself was doing 5,000 cases a year and 6,000 in my last year. Yet this norm is being flouted, and Information Commissioners are working less and less, and pendency is piling up,” he said.