Thursday, July 17, 2014

Clerical error led to incorrect reply to RTI query

Times of India: Lucknow: Thursday, July 17, 2014.
Six months after tendering a response under the Right to Information Act, state women's commission of Uttar Pradesh government on Wednesday rushed to clarify on Wednesday the "correct" budgetary allocation made to it in the previous fiscals. The reportage of error, however, could only be made after chief minister Akhilesh Yadav had to field questions from media about the state's alleged budget cut towards the state women commission (SWC) and had to face sharp attacks about his love for luxury cars by opposition parties.
In response to an RTI query filed by activist Urvashi Sharma in December last year, the public information officer of SWC, in January 2014, said the budget allocation to SWC was Rs 6.52 crore in 2011-12, while in 2012-13, the RTI response said, the figure fell to Rs 5.22 crore. In 2013-14, the funds to SWC appear to have faced a sharp cut, getting reduced to Rs 2.45 crore.
The matter came to a head when opposition parties BJP and BSP began linking the sharp cut in the budget of SWC to the Samajwadi Party government's insensitivity towards women's safety. BSP chief Mayawati reacted to the budgetary cut saying it was proof the SP government did not regard women's safety as a priority issue and added that law and order had touched a new low under Akhilesh, while BJP's state chief Laxmikant Bajpayi also said it was shameful the SP government was choosing to direct government funds on strengthening the CM's fleet of cars, instead.
Dismissing as baseless allegations of budget cut, Akhilesh on Wednesday clarified the fund allocation to SWC had, in fact, been increased in the current fiscal. Shortly after his statement, the state government rushed to rectify its alleged "clerical error" adding that correct information had also been supplied to Sharma, who had raised the query earlier. Speaking to TOI, office superintendent at SWC, A K Gupta said "as a result of a clerical error, an extra zero was added to the 2011-12 figures, making the figure read as 5.10 crore instead of Rs 51 lakh. In 2012-13, the same mistake caused Rs 41.66 lakh to be mistyped as Rs 4.16 crore."
By afternoon, apart from sending a clarification to Sharma, which she confirmed she had received, the government spokesperson also released the budgetary allocation to SWC in the last three years. The allocation for two consecutive years, 2011-12 and 2012-13 was revised as Rs 2.62 crore, while funds for 2013-14 were revised and shown as Rs 2.73 crore.