Daily Bhaskar: Chandigarh: Thursday, April 17, 2014.
Haryana's whistleblower IAS officer Ashok Khemka
who rose to prominence for daring Congress President’s son-in-law, Robert
Vadra’s land deals, has now demanded
compensation from the Prime Minister's Office for delaying information he had
sought under the Right to Information Act.
In an application on September 24, 2013, Khemka had asked for a copy of the letter that UPA chairperson Sonia
Gandhi had written to the Prime Minister requesting him to intervene in the
case of another harassed IAS officer from the Uttar Pradesh, Durga Shakti
Nagpal. Khemka has approached the Central Information Commission for relief
after not getting a reply for over six months.
Khemka in his appeal stated, "The information
sought is vital to prepare my defence/reply to a charge sheet issued to me by
the Haryana government. The motive for issuing the charge sheet is to
determinate my service for exposing the racket and public loot in land releases
and commercial colony land licenses to their cronies and in this particular
case to a company of Robert Vadra, the son-in-law of Sonia Gandhi, by topmost
public servants working in Haryana."
Khemka has pleaded for compensation for the delay
causing him loss to his service career, reputation and mental peace. After not
getting any reply on his initial application, Khemka had moved an appeal before
the appellate authority of the PMO, which was rejected on December 30, 2013 on the grounds that the matter related to approval by the Cabinet and
could not be provided under the RTI Act.
In his appeal, the IAS officer has stated that the
UPA chairperson's letter was all over the media in August 2013 and is not covered under the
exemptions of RTI. He wants a certified copy from the PMO to strengthen his
case.
A 2009 batch IAS officer, Nagpal had taken on illegal sand-mining mafia as
sub-divisional magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar in Uttar Pradesh. She was
suspended on July 27, 2013 by the Akhilesh Yadav government allegedly for demolishing the wall of a
mosque.
In her letter Sonia Gandhi had said, "We must
ensure that the officer is not unfairly treated. At the same time, this
particular instance has highlighted the need to assess whether there are
adequate safeguards in place to protect executive functionaries working beyond
the average call of duty to uphold the rule of law."
Nagpal's suspension had created a major
controversy as it had come immediately after the Vadra scam with the Samajwadi
Party even asking Sonia why she had not intervened in the Vadra affair.