DNA: Mumbai: Friday,
April 04, 2014.
The
compensation was for the harassment they went through when the public
authorities did not part with the information they had sought under the Right
to Information Act.
The orders
for the same were given on April 1, March 19 and 14. All the orders were given
by state chief information commissioner, Ratnakar Gaikwad. Besides
compensating, while giving its order on two applications, the commission has
also ordered the public authorities that the fees taken by them from the RTI
applicants to the tune of Rs 51, 752 and Rs 216 be returned to them.
The order
gives reprieve to those who have been waiting for long to get information. The
cases under which the orders were given range from public interest to those
pertaining to a person not provided information that concerns him. While two
applicants were given compensation of Rs 50,000 each, two others were given Rs
10,000 and Rs 5,000.
While Raju
Ahire, resident of Ghatkopar had sought information on the expenses from the
maintenance department from his M / west ward (Chembur) office, Haidar Hussain
Mohammed Tayeeb Sayeed, resident of Govandi wanted information to know the
illegal rationing and ration card racket in the area. Nanadu Kapadia, resident
of Princess street had some issues of his own that the authority was not
addressing.
"I
wanted information of expenses incurred while cleaning the septic tanks,"
said Hire. He had sought the information in 2011. However, despite three years,
he was not given any information. Commenting that the public information
officer and first appellate authority had displayed "spectacular
irresponsibility" while not adhering to the RTI Act, the commission asked
the ward office to not just give information but also asked the PIO why no
action should be taken on him.
A similar
remark was passed in case of Sayeed too. "There are many ration shops in
our area and plenty with four ration cards to themselves. I had asked in
Govandi my area how many ration cards are there and the documents given with
them. Ration is sold in black in a big way on bogus ration cards," claimed
Sayeed who runs an embroidery business.
In response
he was asked to pay Rs 40,000 first and then another 12,000 in 2011. "They
did not given me right information thought. In first appeal I was asked to seek
ration office specific information," said Sayeed. However, when that too
was not given, the commission directed that Rs 51,752 that he had paid should
be returned with Rs 50,000 as compensation.
Nandu's case
was about his neighbour who had broken a vital wall, because of which, the
structure's stability was endangered. "I had filed two applications
seeking inspection report on the numerous complaints I had filed. I had made
several rounds to the corporation before that but they did not given me any
information. The person had not just broken a vital wall in his premises but
forcefully broke some flooring in my house too. I had filed complaints and
wanted BMC to give me inspection report that they did not," alleged
Kapadia. The commission directed that he be compensated by Rs 50,000 and Rs
10,000 for the same.