Hindustan Times: New
Delhi: Friday, March 14, 2014.
Congress
vice-president Rahul Gandhi mentioned RTI 33 times in his TimesNow interview
two months back. He claimed that the UPA government's biggest contribution in
its fight against corruption was the Right to Information (RTI) Act. However,
HT has found that the transparency Act is slowly becoming ineffective due to
pending appeals, non-action on erring information officers and attacks on RTI
activists.
More than 1.5
lakh appeals are pending before the central information commission (24,000
appeals pending) and state information commissions (SIC), HT has found. The
Congress-ruled states of Maharashtra and Karnataka are among the worst
performers, with 35,000 and 24,000 pending appeals respectively. Some of these
appeals are pending since 2011.
Besides, lack
of disciplinary action against erring public information officers (PIOs) has
led to more applications getting rejected. Across states, PIOs are penalised in
less than 5 per cent of the cases, HT has found. As per the Act, the CIC or
SICs can impose a penalty if the PIO has not furnished the information sought
within 30 days, or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading
information.
But since
such penalties are scarcely imposed, genuine applicants get replies such as
"the query is not specific", "the documents are
voluminous", "information not available" or "the
information is in public domain". HT filed more than 100 RTIs in the past
six months and found that a majority of the applications did not elicit a
proper reply.
Worse, some
applicants don't even get a response.
Former
Central Information Commissioner Sailesh Gandhi explains that in the eight
years since the Act came into being, penalties have been imposed on PIOs in
only 1,000 cases of the more than 1.7 lakh appeals that were disposed.
"This is pathetic. If PIOs don't have the threat of penalty, then RTI is
under threat," he added. Despite Gandhi mentioning in his RTI applications
that he is a former CIC, PIOs in various Maharashtra state departments did not
even bother to reply.
"Most
first-timers get discouraged if the PIO rejects their application on frivolous
grounds. Very few go in appeal but even then the cases remain pending or the
order is given after years," says Rama Nath Jha, lawyer and director of
Transparency International.
As if
rejections were not enough, threats to the lives of RTI activists are scaring
information seekers. As per the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI)
data, to date around 250 individuals have been allegedly attacked, harassed,
their property and belongings damaged and some even murdered for seeking
information under the Act.
Chief
Information Commissioner Sushma Singh could not be reached for comments despite
repeated attempts. However, TY Das, secretary, CIC, said: "The 24,000
appeals are pending because we have a limited number of commissioners. They
dispose of appeals as and when these reach them…. I would not like to comment
further."