Wednesday, August 07, 2013

RTI activists hold protest to oppose amendments

Livemint: New Delhi: Wednesday, August 07, 2013.
Activists shout slogans during a protest against the change
 in the Right to Information (RTI) Act in New Delhi.
Right to information (RTI) activists held a day-long protest in New Delhi on Tuesday to oppose recent amendments cleared by the cabinet that would effectively render void a decision by the Central Information Commission (CIC) that required political parties to make disclosures under the transparency law.
Public mobilization and protests may be the only way to safeguard the law in the wake of the near unanimity among political parties when it comes to keeping themselves outside RTI’s ambit, activists and experts contend. The transparency law was put in place in 2005 after years of nationwide protests and public pressure.
“There is strong public mobilization on the issue. It’s not very visible right now because it’s not being projected well,” said Aruna Roy, a transparency campaigner and former member of the National Advisory Council that sets the government’s social agenda.
“However, this is set to increase in the days to come... This is people’s politics and RTI was born out of people’s politics,” said Roy, who participated in the protest.
The CIC said in a 3 June order that six political parties cited in a petition the ruling Congress party, the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) were substantially funded indirectly by the Union government and can be considered public authorities under the RTI law.
“The act needs to be protected and not strengthened and it is for the people to protect it. RTI is the only law in the country in which the onus for implementation is on the citizens, whereas in all other laws, it is the state that needs to act,” said Jagdeep Chhokar, an RTI expert and one of the petitioners in the case relating to the political parties.