Times of India: Chandigarh:
Friday, May 10, 2013.
In a blatant
show of disregard to HC observation, the Haryana government appointed a deputy
advocate general (DAG), whose integrity had been questioned by the Punjab and Haryana
high court and who was removed from the state judicial service.
Ankur Lal was
appointed to the coveted post of DAG by the department of administration of
justice, Haryana, on May 7, along with 11 other persons, who would represent
Haryana government before the high court and Supreme Court.
The
appointment of Lal has come at a time when the AG office has been hammered by
the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) for not maintaining
"transparency in appointment of law officers" in the AG office of the
state.
The post of
DAG is an important assignment, as he handles various sensitive issues
pertaining to the state government before the high court.
As per
documents procured under Right to Information (RTI) Act, the annual
confidential reports (ACRs) of Lal, during his posting as judicial magistrate
first class (JMIC) at Ferozepur Jhirka (Gurgaon), were recorded as
"C-Below Average-Integrity Doubtful" for the year 2010-11.
These remarks
were recorded by the then administrative judge of Gurgaon sessions's division
Justice Jasbir Singh. Even the representation made by Lal against these remarks
on August 12, 2011 was turned down by the high court administration on
September 29, 2011.
Later, the HC
administration removed him from state judicial service during his probation
period.
When contacted,
advocate general, Haryana, Hawa Singh Hooda expressed ignorance about the
appointment. He, however, said that it is a serious issue, if any such person
has been appointed. "I will inquire into the matter on Friday and take
action accordingly," the AG said.
Lal is said
to be close to a senior Delhi-based politician.
With
Tuesday's appointments, the total number of law officers in state's AG office
has reached 190.
In its recent
report, the CAG had expressed surprise over increase in the number of law
officers to plead state's cases at Chandigarh-based courts from 98 in December
2009 to 179 in 2012 even though the number of courts where they were to defend
the cases remained the same during the said period.
The CAG had
also held that appointments in the AG office were made without assessing the
quantum of work, causing huge financial loss to the state exchequer. The report
has also exposed that often nearly 80% law officers remain without work.