Indian
Express: New Delhi: Monday, November 05, 2012.
While the
Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) is likely to take a decision on Monday on
inclusion or non-inclusion of political parties under the Right to Information
(RTI) Act, RTI activists say it is necessary that parties are brought under RTI
ambit as they claim to work in public interest. Maintaining that their
functioning was transparent, political parties, however, have urged RTI
activists to push for inclusion of defence information not related to national
security under RTI.
The issue came to the fore last week when a
full bench of the CIC, comprising Chief Information Commissioner Satyananda
Mishra and information commissioners Annapurna Dixit and M L Sharma, was
convened to decide on whether political parties come under the RTI Act or not.
The CIC is considering the case whether political parties, which receive
benefits from the government in the form of subsidised buildings for offices,
free air-time and various tax exemptions, come under the RTI Act.
As per
Section 2 (H) of RTI Act, NGOs substantially financed, directly or indirectly
by funds provided by the appropriate government are liable to reply to queries
sent under the transparency law. Former State Election Commisioner Vijay
Kuvlekar said if parties were being “substantially” funded by the government,
they should come under RTI. “But as they receive donations from many sources, I
wonder whether that amounts to being ‘substantially’ financed,” he said.
However, RTI
activist Vijay Kumbhar of the Surajya Sangarsh Samiti said political parties
get offices and funding from both central and state governments. “Besides, they
get donations from several sources. The public is interested in knowing where
these funds come from and who the donors are,” Kumbhar said.
Maj Gen
(retd) S C N Jatar of Association of Democratic Reforms said, “Any organisation
that is registered with the government must come under RTI. Charitable trusts
that receive donations and are registered come under RTI,” he said.
Alleging that
funds are “splurged” by political parties, Maruti Bhapkar of India Against
Corruption (IAC) said, “The public should know about the funding of political
parties. Whether they receive funds from the country or are funded by foreign
organisations, it should become public knowledge. As they are registered
parties, they should be in a position to provide information about their
expenditure and receipts.” This, said Manav Kamble of the Nagari Haqq Suraksha
Samiti, will make the functioning of the political parties transparent.
“Political parties hide many things. By bringing them under RTI ambit, their
functioning will be in the public domain,” Kamble said.
Prashant
Inamdar of Pedestrians First,said, “Anything related to governance or public
interest, whichever sector it is from, should be in public domain. Any
disclosure which will detrimental to national security should not be made
public. Bringing political parties under RTI purview will be a logical step.
Saying
political parties are “answerable” to people, Jugal Rathi of PMP Pravasi Manch
said, “It will help in ending criminalisation of politics that was growing by
the day. Transparency in functioning of political parties would also help
voters in making the right choice.”