The
Times of India: Nagpur: Sunday, October 28, 2012.
Even as NIT
is facing wrath of citizens and NGOs for allegedly splurging public money on
its platinum jubilee celebrations, more details are tumbling out regarding its
extravagant expenditure.
Citing RTI
documents, young law student Ankita Shah, who has filed a PIL in the Bombay
High Court, has alleged that NIT had originally planned to bear the entire
expenditure of Rs300 crore from its own funds which it had termed as
"excess". Even the NIT board of trustees had cleared the proposal.
Shah also
raised a serious question mark as to why NIT had not declared the name of
sponsors till filing of PIL a couple of days back. It was only when the
petition was filed that NIT chairman Pravin Darade held a press conference to
announce sponsors. She also alleged that name of main sponsor - CREDAI - was
not mentioned in any advertisement till date and were declared only in press
meet on the same day the PIL was filed. Darade refused to speak to TOI. "I
have informed everything in the press meet and there is nothing more to
say," he said.
He blamed TOI
of unnecessarily promoting "vested interests" of Kamlesh Shah,
Ankita's father, calling him a convict in case of warehouse collapse where six
people were killed. "That person wants to settle personal scores with
us," Darade said.
CREDAI
secretary Anil Nair told TOI that he had apprised officials to include their
name in the promotional activities. However, he was evasive on funds being
allocated by their organization to NIT. "Since it is a noble cause
involving general public, we have decided to sponsor it. Even in past, we had
offered sponsorship for many such events," he said.
Nair also
failed to give satisfactory answer on which date CREDAI had actually granted
sponsorship to NIT. "I don't remember the date, but the decision was taken
by our executive committee after long deliberations. The talks were going on
since very long," he claimed.
Hindu
Mahasabha's Mohan Karemore who had also served a legal notice to Darade, stated
that NIT should have first developed its 572 and 1900 layouts along with
gardens instead of 'wasting money' on such activities. He demanded high-level
probe into entire affair.
Endorsing
him, former ZP member Kunda Raut, who had earlier led a delegation of Zingabai
Takli over lack of civic amenities, pointed out that the NIT had started
regularizing 1,900 unauthorized layouts some 12 years ago and the area is among
one of the localities but had not completed the process even now. In 2002, NIT
recovered hefty amounts from Zingabai Takli residents as development charges
but so far it failed to even provide basic amenities, she claimed, adding that
almost 99% residents had paid the amount.