Deccan
Herald: New Delhi: Saturday, October 27, 2012.
The Central
Information Commission (CIC) has suggested that the Department of Personnel and
Training (DoPT), the nodal ministry to frame RTI rules, to refrain from
splitting the queries made in one application and instead prepare response
after compiling all details.
Chief
Information Commissioner Satyananda Mishra asked for revising the present
system of sending different queries in one RTI application to different
information officers.
“Unless the
RTI application contains unmanageably a large number of queries, spread over
the entire department, the effort must be to compile the information centrally
after sourcing it from individual divisions and then to provide information to
the information seeker.
“We would
like the Chief Public Information Officers (CPIO) to place this before the
Secretary of the Department for taking an appropriate decision and to revise
the present arrangement,” Mishra said.
The apex body
under the transparency law noted that the DoPT had appointed a large number of
CPIO for the benefit of the citizens.
“However, RTI
applications containing more than one item of information are being split by
the RTI cell of the department among many of these CPIOs to respond directly to
the information seeker.
As a result
of this, quite often, it is noted that the CPIO representing the individual
division/section of the Department responds to the information seeker
mechanically by stating that the information is not available or by providing
only a piecemeal information,” the Commission said.
The Commission
was hearing an appeal filed by noted RTI activist Subhash C Agrawal, seeking
information whether the Prime Minister was aware of Justice P B Sawant report
allegedly indicting Anna Hazare and if any action was taken on the issue.
The DoPT had
responded to Agrawal by saying that it had no idea if the Prime Minister was
aware about it or not, but suggested him to approach the Maharashtra government
for further details as it had appointed the Sawant Commission.
The
Commission, however, rejected a plea of Agrawal to hold CPIO responsible for
not transferring his application to Maharashtra government on the ground that
he was obliged for it under the RTI Act.