Thursday, July 28, 2016

NGOs, too, open for public scrutiny, 'RTI won't allow us to build a toilet' : by Shamindra Ferdinando

Island.lk : Sri Lanka: Thursday, July 28, 2016.
The Right to Information (RTI) Act would give the public as well as the media unhindered access to projects undertaken by local NGOs receiving direct and indirect funds from the government and external sources, Transparency International (Sri Lanka Chapter) representative Shan Wijetunga told a seminar held at the Information Department yesterday.
Responding to a query by The Island regarding the RTI Act's impact on the NGO community, Wijetunga acknowledged that a spate of allegations had been directed against various NGOs, particularly after Dec 2004 tsunami. The Island cited the case of one NGO receiving as much as USD 6 mn during a three year period before eelam war IV from the government of Norway to promote peace and reconciliation.
Wijetunga said that the RTI could be utilised by anyone to seek information from both the public sector and the NGO community. Wijetunga explained that NGOs would have to maintain documents up to 12 years in accordance with the RTI Act and provide answers in writing to those who had raised issues with them.
The seminar was told that all public sector projects worth USD 1 mn or more and other work estimated to cost more than Rs. 500,000 had to be revealed three months before the commencement to enable the public to raise any issue in respect of those projects. Wijetunga revealed that during a workshop held for members of parliament recently, a minister had declared that the RTI would even prevent the construction of even a toilet unless it was done in a transparent manner.
The audience queried whether political parties and religious groups would be subject to RTI Act. Wijetunga said that they hadn't been covered though various funds set up by politicians could be scrutinized. Wijetunga asserted that pressure could be exerted on the establishment to bring political parties, too, under the purview of RTI Act.
RTI activist Nalaka Gunawardena said the public could go beforethe Supreme Court seeking an interpretation as regards political parties as well as religious organisations.
Wijetunga alleged that the previous government had used national security as an excuse to repeatedly block the RTI Act.
Quoting UNP National List MP and constitutional affairs expert Dr. Jayampathy Wickremaratne, Wijetunga said that Sri Lanka's RTI Act had received international recognition because it accepted the policy that information wouldn't be withheld if its release would be beneficial to the public than the damage caused by withholding it.
Wijetunga claimed that journalists had been killed for the coverage of the acquisition of MiG 27s during the war.
Referring to the recent destruction of Army Central armoury at Salawa, Wijetunga said, the RTI Act would pave the way for the public to seek information regarding similar facilities located in other parts of the country. Although specific details couldn't be provided, the Army couldn't deprive the public of the right to know, Wijetunga said. Responding to a query, Wijetunga said that until the government established the RTI mechanism including the five-member commission, heads of government institutions and NGOs would have to be responsible for the release of information. In the case of the Government Information department, its DG, Dr Ranga Kalansuriya would be accountable, Wijetunga said.