The Hindu: Mumbai: Friday, November 16, 2018.
The Maharashtra State Information
Commission (SIC) has 39,709 appeals and complaints pending, as the government
is yet to respond to the SIC’s demand in June for the appointment of three
additional commissioners. Of the cases, 16,718 were in 2017, which raises
concerns over the implementation of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
According to data available with The
Hindu, by the end of September 2018, a total of 35,315 appeals and 4,394
complaints were pending with the SIC.
Ever since the RTI Act was implemented,
the highest number of pending cases recorded in Maharashtra is in 2018. The
State is unable to clear cases from 2014. For this year, 20,734 cases were
pending till September, by which, all eight information commissioners had
disposed of only 3,550 cases.
The State had no Chief Information
Commissioner (CIC) for over nine months after Ratnakar Gaikwad stepped down
from the post in 2017. Former Chief Secretary Sumit Mullick was appointed the
CIC in May 2018.
“The
SIC had in June this year written to the government demanding three more
information commissioners to clear the pending cases. We receive 600-700 cases
every month, but due to the backlog, we have not been able to attend to all
these cases,” an official from the SIC said.
The official said despite having brought
Mr. Mullick in May, he was tasked with handling the proceedings of the
Bhima-Koregaon riot hearing. “His priority is the hearing of the riot case. He
is not able to focus and spend time to clear the pending cases,” the official
said. Mr. Mullick was in Pune on Thursday in connection with the Bhima-Koregaon
case, and could not be contacted.
Former Central Information Commissioner
Shailesh Gandhi told The Hindu that he has been writing to Mr. Mullick for over
four months requesting to clear cases. “Keeping cases pending for months and
years is itself contradicting the very passing of the Act. People come seeking
information and we cannot keep them waiting for long,” he said.
Mr. Gandhi said there appears to be no
evidence of the average disposal of over 800 cases per month by the
commissioners, and at this rate, the total disposal will take more than a year.
He also pointed out a Karnataka High Court decision which mandates that second
appeals be decided by an Information Commission within 45 days.