Times of India: New Delhi: Saturday, August 19, 2017.
An RTI query
about how projects are chosen and their progress under the MPLADS has prompted
the CIC to ask BJP why the party should not be considered a "public
authority" and brought under the ambit of the RTI Act.
In an order
that is scathing about the lack of transparency in the government as well as
political parties, information commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu has asked the
chief whip of the BJP party, leader, deputy leader in the Lok Sabha "or
any other authorised representative" as to why the BJP Parliamentary party
should not be declared as a public authority under section 2(h) of the RTI Act
by September 7. The order notes that the political party is being queried on
the basis of the possibility of a policy of guidelines being issued from the
party for selection of projects for MP Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS)
funds.
A public
authority, under the RTI Act, means any body or institution established or
constituted by or under the Constitution, or by any other law made by
Parliament. The order came on a complaint by Vishnu Dev Bhandari who wanted to
know the progress of works under the MPLADS and the basis on which they were
selected in his constituency Madhubani by his local representative, BJP's
Hukumdev Narayan Yadav.
Bhandari
complained to the central information commission (CIC) after he received no
reply to his RTI application from the public information officer of the
ministry of statistics and programme implementation.
Acharyulu,
who noted that who else but the voter has the right to question how his
representative was spending funds, added that in principle, every legislative
and parliamentary party should be considered a "public authority". As
such, he has also asked other political parties to respond to the order, though
only BJP has been asked to respond by September 7.
Besides,
Hukumdev Yadav's private secretary was directed to furnish details of the work
recommended by him, the criterion of selection or rejection and progress of the
work before September 7. Acharyulu also directed the ministry and district
collectors to answer the petition in 30 days.
Incidentally,
the CIC is to examine the matter of political parties being under the ambit of
RTI Act under a full bench. In Acharyulu's order, he has also asked civil
society members to express their opinions and contentions and send them to the
id, madabhushisridhar@gov.in before September 8.
Noting in his
order that every MP gets Rs 5 crore per annum for local area development, which
comes from tax payers money, the Commission recommended voluntarily disclosure
of the criterion for selection of works under MPLADs, along with constituency
wise work list and their progress on the party website.
The ministry
of statistics had said that actual progress on the field could be ascertained
only by local authorities like the district magistrate. Acharyulu however, said
the information is "partly held" by the ministry, district collectors
and magistrates in the constituency, the Member of Parliament and his
legislature party, if they have any guidelines or policy regarding allocation
of funds.