Times of India: New Delhi: Wednesday,
April 05, 2017.
A controversy
over the government’s proposed rules and procedures for the Right to
Information (RTI) Act overlooks the simple point that the goal right now should
be to move on to a Duty to Publish rather than clean up the working of the RTI
Act. The government says that the changes it has proposed were formulated by
the previous UPA government and that it is merely taking forward the process
started by its predecessor.
Certain of
the proposed changes have caused alarm among RTI activists. The provision that
an RTI query would lapse if the questioner passes away while the query is being
processed certainly could have ominous implications.
The surest
way to prevent uncomfortable information surfacing on account of an RTI query
from a pesky interlocutor would, indeed, be to bump him off. While this
certainly could not have been the intent of either this or the previous
government, the possibility cannot be dismissed out of hand, given the reality
of repeated attacks and killings of RTI activists in different parts of the
country.
At the same
time, the proposal to limit the size of the question and to raise the RTI fee
to Rs50 do make sense, to make the process more efficacious and not a burden on
the exchequer. But the real reform called for in relation to the citizens’
right to know is to move forward on a conceptual rather than merely procedural
plane. Once a government decision is taken, there is no reason why every file
noting relating to it should not be placed in the public domain. Of course,
information that might compromise national security and is thus outside the
purview of RTI even now can continue to be kept confidential.
But there is
no reason why the government should sit on the details of public
decision-making till someone puts in a query. It should proactively publish on
its website all its paperwork on the matter in a way that is easily accessible.
Information on the working of the government is a powerful source of citizen
empowerment. As India’s democracy matures, citizens ought to have greater and
easier access to that information.