Gold Coast Bulletin: Tasmania: Friday,
March 31, 2017.
A RIGHT to
information request for the minutes of the Marine Farm Planning Review Panel’s
meetings about Tassal’s Okehampton Bay project has been almost entirely
redacted.
But the
decision appears to be based on a selective reading of the Right to Information
Act, University of Tasmania expert Rick Snell says.
The panel
performed an independent review into Tassal’s proposal to install 28 salmon
pens in Okehampton Bay on the state’s East Coast, and its report to Primary
Industries Minister Jeremy Rockliff supporting the plan was publicly released
in February.
Minutes of
three meetings since August last year were partially released in the RTI
request, but only details of procedural business were not redacted. Three pages
of information were not released at all.
The officer
removed wording from a section of the Act in their decision letter which
accompanied the request.
The wording
clarified that the exemption from release of opinions, advice or
recommendations prepared for a minister applied to information prepared by “an
officer of a public authority or a minister.”
Associate
Professor Snell said when read in full the section did not appear to apply to
the minutes requested, because a number of members of the panel were not
officers of public authorities or ministers.
“I would be
suspicious when a decision maker selectively gives you back wording of the Act
and critical words are removed,” he said.
It was
possible the minutes could be exempted under a different section of the Act,
but would likely be subject to a public interest test, he said.
The request
was made by Greens marine environment spokeswoman Rosalie Woodruff, who has
appealed the decision to Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the
Environment secretary John Whittington.
Ms Woodruff
said the Government’s refusal to release the information was “endemic and
unhealthy,” and the community had a right to know what the panel had
recommended.
A DPIPWE
spokeswoman said information about opinions, advice or recommendations being
prepared for a minister in connection with their parliamentary duty could be
exempt from release.